the twice impeached disgraced ex-president to overturn his election defeat. it s a glaring and unavoidable fact that mike pence one of the key stories of january 6th and the person that the entire plotry lied on doing what trump wanted him to do. he never testified about what happened to him or what made his whole family and the secret service detail run or what happened to the country for that matter under oath. today we have news of a potential break through on that front specifically. a federal judge ordered mike pence to testify before the federal grand jury under oath. that grand jury is investigating the january 6th insurrection and donald trump s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. judge boseberg rejected donald trump s and mike pence s efforts to block a subpoena. trump s lawyers asked the judge s predecessor to limit pence s testimony claiming certain issues were off limits because of executive privilege that protects communications between the president and some
he was 18 years old, he worked part-time at the drive-through at a local wendy s, yet police said he had at least $4,000 of brand-new weapons, including two ar-15 rifles, 1600 rounds of .556 ammunition, a ballistic vest, and 60 magazines. one of his rivals was a high-end model manufactured by a company called daniel defense. according to a receipt that he posted in private message, that gun cost $2,000 and he paid in full. he could have bought effectively the very same rifle at any one store for a third of the cost. but apparently to him, price was no object. that s pretty weird. if police know where he got the money to buy one of the most expensive ar-15s on the market, they are not telling us. nor for that matter have they explained why they lied about the most basic facts of the shooting. for the first 24 hours they told us that a school resource officer fired at the government. he engaged. but they must ve known at the time they said it that that was not true. they must
Seconds worth of distance run, yours is the earth and everything that is in it, and which is more you will be a man, my son. This Chamber Tonight is full not just of men and women but some of the finest men and women i have ever met in my life. And i am so proud to have spent the past 17 hours with every ne of you. And were not finished yet. We have more hours to go. I called up Carolyn Mccarthy today. I wanted her to know what we were doing. I didnt catch her. She wasnt home. But i left a message on the phone and told her that we were standing up for the issue that she cared most about and dedicated her life towards changing. And i feel that she in so many and so Many Americans were inspired by what we did tonight. My phone was ringing off the hook all day long thanking the democrats for finally standing up, for being determined, for making a difference. And i can tell you that i think we truly did make a difference. Its the first time that the g. O. P. Totally changed their plans, th
Will join us in the debate . Is there not one of you that would defend your position . Only to run away in the middle of the night . Shame. Shame. Irene adler, from new york. No bill, no break no bill, no break let me start by saying thank you again. John lewis, katherine clark, dated the sweeney, bringing us together for this debate. This debate is not a new debate. Some of us have been involved for a long time. I chaired the subcommittee on gun control in new york state. Not much has changed. We were then the capital of gun violence. No other country in the world, other than those involved in active wars, have done deaths more than three digits. We have 33,000 a year. Its insanity. Thousands of mentally ill people. We know what we have to do. Ago, andbout 14 hours i didnt anticipate speaking again. I have listened all day to emotional appeals, and the factss but i heard the , we arent going to get done, not as long as the politics are as they are, not as long as the republicans are t
That he wanted to harm or indicate in any way that he wanted to harm any of the protectees of the president. Walking, and there was a bulge in the back of his jacket. As ive been briefed here. And the officer approached him, and noticed that he had a hatchet in the back of his pants. As i was briefed. The hatchet, my understanding, in d. C. Is not in violation of the law, if its considered to be used for campingtype activities. And thats what his individual indicated he had the hatchet for. The individual also allowed for gave a consent search of his vehicle. So he was very cooperative during the interview. When they searched his vehicle, there were no weapo found in equipment to again the story that he was involved in camping activities, so again he was released from the interview then subsequently on september 19 and again three of the officers who were familiar with the hatchet interview recognized him. Weve got a better job of communicating. There is officers who saw him more thing