Well, im the last at the table. But i have to say it doesnt strike me as fair to apply criteria that arent written to a project developer, and that if we want more out of the eastern plan, then we should be clear about that with additional guidelines. And if theyre consistent with the plan, which is what you said, staff, then im having a hard time understanding why i wouldnt support the staff recommendation. Yes, ill make the motion to approve. What are you moving . This matter has been called up together. Its usually one vote for both items. But if theres a preference to take up the matter separately, we can do that. Commissioner moore. So for the benefit of commissioner diamond not having participated in the many years that we are trying to struggle with impacts of the slightly wronglyscaled and conditioned development on the mission, this particular commission has taken a very, very specific stand on trying to avoid any further negative and decimating impacts on that. And our discus
The consent calendar please. Do you want to call for Public Comment on item eight . Any Public Comments on our comments . Thank you. Next item, please. Item nine is consent calendar. All items listed are considered to be retained by the San Francisco Public Utilities commission and acted upon by a single vote of the commission. No separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission or public rate ques quests. The matter will be removed from the calendar and considered a separate item. Commissioners, would you like any item removed . All foz, i dont. Okay. General public, any item remov removed . May i have a motion . All of those in favor . The motion carries. Next item. Item ten write approve modifications of the San Francisco San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Grant program and authorize a general manager to approve future modifications to the Grant Program. Commissioners, steve ritchie, this is an item to make some minor changes to the Grant Program rules. Th
Accommodation for projects for not allowing it and then saying we wont make that accommodation any more and makes people upset because theyre feeling theyre just doing it for that and i think a lot of folks are frustrated with pg e. Its just so indicate. Inconsistent. Thank you. Thank you so much. For the public update. I have a couple of questions that ive asked before in different ways. But i just want to revisit a little bit, the whole clean power sf launch and programming and success that weve been realizing and some of our early goals in your presentation just to reiterate from an environmental perspective that the whole idea behind clean power sf was to really drive more quickly towards our citywide goal of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction to be in compliance with the state. So ghg reduction emission. The second goal from an environmental perspective was to help us as a city reach our 100 renewable by 2030 goal that we are driving toward and the opportunity that a program like c
Next item, please. Item nine is consent calendar. All items listed are considered to be retained by the San Francisco Public Utilities commission and acted upon by a single vote of the commission. No separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission or public rate ques quests. The matter will be removed from the calendar and considered a separate item. Commissioners, would you like any item removed . All foz, i dont. Okay. General public, any item remov removed . May i have a motion . All of those in favor . The motion carries. Next item. Item ten write approve modifications of the San Francisco San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Grant program and authorize a general manager to approve future modifications to the Grant Program. Commissioners, steve ritchie, this is an item to make some minor changes to the Grant Program rules. The first of which is to change the name of the program to the onsite water reuse program. Secondly is to expand existing requirements
Centre of any in the united states. It is the largest collection of monumental municipal buildings of any city. It is a National Treasure and we need a Strong Organization to help tell that story and get people to come because for the last 50 or 70 years, the area has been misunderstood, it has been neglected, and it has been ignored. The c. B. D. Is one of the biggest steps along with a number of others in the last ten years to try to overcome that but more needs to be done. If case in case you havent seen it, i have written it all up in a book that i have put out recently and i hope that you all have gotten a copy and read it closely because the last chapter underscores a lot of the things that happened to mess things up. So i will leave some of my flyers here to encourage you to get the book. [laughter]. Next speaker. Good afternoon. My name is susan and i represent the San Francisco conservatory of music. We are enthusiastic supporters of the c. B. D. We have 400 and more students