Present time uop [speaker not understood] dental school is renovating a building that already has these broad plates on 5th street near mission. And i was a graduate of the earlier facility and i can speak to the difficulty that facility has in its present location because of the narrowness. So, its not just tech, but other uses. Its important that we get broad floor plates. However, this has to be correct and i think the things theyve done in terms of tower separation, bulk, are very much in keeping with the code. As was pointed out by mr. Guy, because of the tdr sold by 6 20, 63 1 howard, there never will be another tower that they have to separate themselves from because even if that building were to be destroyed in a fire or some other manner, it could never be built to more of a height than its at now because theyve already sold their tdrs. And then the bulk, there are a number of ways that you can grant exceptions and major variations in the skin of the building, and theyre certa
Could come in that same location. Again, it could not go in another location unless it met the specific criteria laid out in this ordinance. And i guess my only question is with the medical use designation zoning that we have now, is it mostly fall under business professional use or is it a special category that exists . Not talking about this particular case, but just in general when you look at the existing medical use in that neighborhood. Is it zoned specifically medical use or [speaker not understood] . Zoning is sacramento street neighborhood district. The land use is what youre talking about. Right. I think there are more of the medical Service Type Land uses in this district. Theres not that many just office or professional service uses. But what we do have are a lot of counseling services, therapists, that sort of use in the neighborhood. I guess what im trying to make sure, its just that i know some cases we have specific use zoning and i dont know like if a medical service u
Of towers, within sbulk district the code requires setbacks from interior Property Lines and abutting streets. In order to preserve openness to the sky and avoid perception of overwhelming mass. [speaker not understood] along the howard, second, and tehema street frontages. [speaker not understood], the Property Line jogs to the east. In the previous design this was the area that was to be acquired from the adjacent property creating a space to comply with the [speaker not understood] requirements. The current design of the project does not comply with the current setback and a new exception is needed that was not previously granted. The conditions on the adjacent property will allow the setbacks to be met. [speaker not understood]. Encroachment is setback to a loading dock [speaker not understood] 63 1 howard street. This property has sold all of its Transferrable Development rights, tdr, therefore the property cannot be enlarged under the tdr code. [speaker not understood] the encroa
Sacramento street ncd which runs from lions street to spruce street on sacramento. When drafting legislation we wanted to make sure that we respected the concerns that created the prohibition in the first place. In 1987 when these controls were in place there were concerns that medical service uses were displacing Neighborhood Service neighborhood serving businesses and residential units. I really should not have ran up those stairs. Excuse me. Obviously Community Outreach is very important when doing legislation like this. Mr. Mitchell reached out to the merchants on this street and to sam, with the presidio [speaker not understood] to explain the challenges she was s. P. R. Tion with her property. Our office did the same and included san in the drafting of the legislation to make sure everyone was comfortable, that the controls in the ncd would still preserve the existing neighborhood serving retail uses and residential units. I also met mr. Mitchell at the property and then walked t
Dimension of the floor which has increased by 7 feet. Staff believes that the current design still meets the criteria for granting of a bulk exception. With respect to the separation of towers, within sbulk district the code requires setbacks from interior Property Lines and abutting streets. In order to preserve openness to the sky and avoid perception of overwhelming mass. [speaker not understood] along the howard, second, and tehema street frontages. [speaker not understood], the Property Line jogs to the east. In the previous design this was the area that was to be acquired from the adjacent property creating a space to comply with the [speaker not understood] requirements. The current design of the project does not comply with the current setback and a new exception is needed that was not previously granted. The conditions on the adjacent property will allow the setbacks to be met. [speaker not understood]. Encroachment is setback to a loading dock [speaker not understood] 63 1 ho