19605, wow, what if this was real? in the 1960s, and adoption agency in new york began a policy to deliberately split up identical and fraternal twins and place the infants in different families. the adoptive parents were never told that their children had siblings. film; parents were never told that their children had siblings. children had siblings. any one ado ted children had siblings. any one adapted in children had siblings. any one adopted in the children had siblings. any one adopted in the 60s children had siblings. any one adopted in the 60s have - children had siblings. any one| adopted in the 60s have every children had siblings. any one - adopted in the 60s have every right to think perhaps they have a twin. they were placed in a controversial study to explore what makes us who we are and how much is defined by nature versus nurture. but at what cost? ~ . , ., , cost? what they did was so unethical. cost? what they did was so unethical, so cost? what
twins and i would test the child and do some film samples of them. thea;r do some film samples of them. they would rive do some film samples of them. they would give me do some film samples of them. they would give me these do some film samples of them. they would give me these exams, these tests would give me these exams, these tests and would give me these exams, these tests and would be filming them and ithink tests and would be filming them and i think i tests and would be filming them and i think i felt very anxious when they i think i felt very anxious when they would come to the house. and there are many. they would come to the house. and there are many, many tests given to them there are many, many tests given to them. intelligence, there are many, many tests given to them. intelligence, personality, i them. intelligence, personality, motion them. intelligence, personality, motion relative. them. intelligence, personality, motion relative. they them. intell
families who were not told the real i purpose of the study. they were told only that purpose of the study. they were told only that their purpose of the study. they were told only that their child purpose of the study. they were told only that their child was purpose of the study. they were told only that their child was in purpose of the study. they were told only that their child was in a - purpose of the study. they were told only that their child was in a child i only that their child was in a child development only that their child was in a child development study, only that their child was in a child development study, was - only that their child was in a child development study, was alreadyi development study, was already involved. development study, was already involved. and development study, was already involved, and it development study, was already involved, and it was development study, was already involved, and it was obvious - development study, was