it should not have been, and a little bit of what karl rove just said come up with the president does not have any coattails, and we will talk about conor lamb being an exceptional candidate, which he is. but the truth of the matter is that it should not come to this. and if it comes to this repeatedly in november, the republican party cannot put in the resources. they cannot put in $10 million into dozens and dozens of close races. and it is not a good sign, even if saccone spells it out by a couple of points but i would not feel good if i was the head of the rnc. martha: how does this reflect on the work that the gnc has done, karl rove? we hear that this is all about candidates, they need really strong candidates in all of these places. i am involved in a super packed on the senate side, and there are limits to what they can do, the principal reason a canna gets gets close to winning or wins is because of the candidate in the campaign s organization.
about the a320. that is a digital fly-by-wire system aircraft which, as opposed to having big control wheels, has side stick controls that are independent of one another, at the co-pilot station and at the pilot station. and it offers something called flight envelope protection. and simply what that means is that the pilot cannot put flight inputs or control inputs that would exceed the par ram meters that are preprogrammed into the computers. when the pilot controls the aircraft with these kind of joy sticks that they have it sends a an electronic relay to computers which interpret the pilot s control inputs. then if the software is programmed for those inputs it allows the aircraft to follow
so he is a free man. he can leave the country. and swiss authorities have said that the u.s. cannot put in another extradition request for him but they can put in an extradition request to another country. so that probably will restrict where polanski travels to next. in terms of why the decision came down, basically the swiss authorities requested for court records from the united states. that request was rejected. and because of that, the swiss authorities say, quote, considering the persisting doubts concerning the presentation of the facts of the case, the request has to be rejected. atika, i m curious, what does this mean for the case moving forward? is it over? certainly, there must be appeals pending now. it is over in terms of the swiss role. switzerland arrested polanski