All change in greece after a snap election, but what are the economic challenges facing the incoming Prime Minister . European markets look like this at the start of a new trading week. We will have the details of all you need to know. And, getting an early taste for business. We meet the former teenage entrepreneur who began selling ice cream at the age of 15 and turned that cash into a pizza chain. Today we want to know, with prom season in full swing in the uk and parents splashing out on their kids for the big day, are we taking this american tradition too far . Should we indulge our children . Let us know just use the bbcbizlive. Welcome to the programme. It was once the worlds biggest Financial Institution. But now Deutsche Bank has confirmed one of the biggest overhauls at an Investment Bank since the aftermath of the financial crisis. Its confirmed that 18,000 jobs are to go over three years as part of a restructuring plan. That will ultimately cost 7. 4 billion euros or 8. 3 b
Asia. Rishaad we saw some tailwinds in the asiapacific, and it does it stop here . That question after asian stocks had their best week in six months. At what isa look going on here. Equities at record highs, but analysts seeing earnings season providing a further boost. Is essentially earnings per share coming through, and they are Getting Better and better. Companies had their profit estimates lifted by an average by analysts. Sts here for the rally to be sustained. Haidi whether this sentiment story or the fundamentals, it looks like earnings season looking buoyant as that gets underway. It is a big event risk week. , whether in particular that changes the narrative of the synchronize Global Growth story. China, cpi and ppi readings out of the United States after that payrolls number disappointed. Singapore, taiwan, and malaysia coming online. Lets get it over to sophie. Monday, momentum sustained in kuala lumpur, the index adding to the 1 gain last week, that building on decembers
Down. Then stepped. Down. Now according to the office of. The last Big Government shutdown there were two during president clinton got. President of iraq back in two thousand and thirteen. Twenty five billion dollars according to experts that are other things could be expanded government shot down for example signing up for new social. Programs. Goes on for an extended period of time cutting a lot of things out of iraq that may run into trying to figure or bring new Product Support to the state department applications. And bang on one first some can be challenging im not a Government Shutdown. That much more in. Congress hasnt been right. The way the government. Powers are taking away. What a federal government will close if congress does not pass a funding bill by Midnight Ride that the closure will not only cost taxpayers money as weve discussed on the program before but if a shutdown lasts longer than a few days. Private sector jobs and put it in economic reform expect that was the
When you say we are talking about a remedy not in terms of finding a violation. Dont say you are implementing congresss intent when you look at what a congress 60 years later would do. When you are rendering a gender discriminatory statute by leveling up or down you are not using congresss intent. But you will ask what would they have wanted if they knew they couldnt make this discrimination. I thought if you have to go back to 52, they are going to either have to take the benefit away from the woman or give it to the man. They hate that. They get into trouble when they take benefits away. That moves them in one direction and also moves them in the same direction if there are a handful of men who might benefit. If there were millions of men who might benefit they might get worried about what they are doing particularly since they are discriminating more against the married couple. I was interested in those questions, but i take it you have said what you can say on that. All you can say
When you say we are talking about a remedy not in terms of finding a violation. Dont say you are implementing congresss intent when you look at what a congress 60 years later would do. When you are rendering a gender discriminatory statute by leveling up or down you are not using congresss intent. But you will ask what would they have wanted if they knew they couldnt make this discrimination. I thought if you have to go back to 52, they are going to either have to take the benefit away from the woman or give it to the man. They hate that. They get into trouble when they take benefits away. That moves them in one direction and also moves them in the same direction if there are a handful of men who might benefit. If there were millions of men who might benefit they might get worried about what they are doing particularly since they are discriminating more against the married couple. I was interested in those questions, but i take it you have said what you can say on that. All you can say