Do you make of the white house statement that this impeachment probe is constitutionally valid invalid and violates due process. I may not use those words but i would say its constitutionally very troubling. To elaborate, the framers were ambivalent about impeachment power, debating whether to create it at all and who should exercise it. They understood that tremendous potential for misuse given the british parliamentary practice and the difficulty in cabining it a bit. They moved it to high crimes and misdemeanors, mentioning treason and bribery. What they expected was the house to unfold things with a certain decorum, follow certain procedures many i wouldnt use the word due process. I wouldnt think that applies in a constitutional sense. Paul thats what i want to focus on, david. Seems to me, you look at the language of the constitution, what it says is the house has the power to impeach, high crimes and misdemeanors and so on but it doesnt say how it goes about it. The due process
Statement that this impeachment probe is constitutionally valid invalid and violates due process. I may not use those words but i would say its constitutionally very troubling. To elaborate, the framers were ambivalent about impeachment power, debating whether to create it at all and who should exercise it. They understood that tremendous potential for misuse given the british parliamentary practice and the difficulty in cabining it a bit. They moved it to high crimes and misdemeanors, mentioning treason and bribery. What they expected was the house to unfold things with a certain decorum, follow certain procedures many i wouldnt use the word due process. I wouldnt think that applies in a constitutional sense. Paul thats what i want to focus on, david. Seems to me, you look at the language of the constitution, what it says is the house has the power to impeach, high crimes and misdemeanors and so on but it doesnt say how it goes about it. The due process protections that we think about
Statement that this impeachment probe is constitutionally valid invalid and violates due process. I may not use those words but i would say its constitutionally very troubling. To elaborate, the framers were ambivalent about impeachment power, debating whether to create it at all and who should exercise it. They understood that tremendous potential for misuse given the british parliamentary practice and the difficulty in cabining it a bit. They moved it to high crimes and misdemeanors, mentioning treason and bribery. What they expected was the house to unfold things with a certain decorum, follow certain procedures many i wouldnt use the word due process. I wouldnt think that applies in a constitutional sense. Paul thats what i want to focus on, david. Seems to me, you look at the language of the constitution, what it says is the house has the power to impeach, high crimes and misdemeanors and so on but it doesnt say how it goes about it. The due process protections that we think about
Critics say it is not enough. And chasing tesla. New luxury car seeks to overrun tesla. We will run down the features, including the price. Slack chairs are plunging in after hours trading after the company gave its first earning report as a public company. While it beat analyst expectations for both secondquarter revenue and earnings, it projected slower sales growth for the second half of the year. Aboutsaid revenue will be 154 million in the third quarter, signaling that strong competition may dent the Software Makers rapid rise. Shares are falling about 15 in the postmarket, following the results that its poised for a record low. Joining me to discuss, nico and larry. Great to have you. Weve had a few hours now to digest the earnings. Give me some of the big concerns here. Is the big concern that Topline Revenue growth . Well, thats something i dont cover. I cover i work for technical professionals. I talk to the geek in the room, the i. T. Professionals about installing and securi
For one last visit. For viewers who havent seen 0 one of your 20 appearances on the Program Since 2003, remind them what the National Taxpayer advocate does the National Taxpayer advocate is appointed by the secretary of treasury and serves in the Internal Revenue service and had the organization Taxpayer Advocate service to help taxpayers solve theirproblems with the irs and im charged with meeting making administrative recommendations to congress , to mitigate those problems and this is sort of in dispute resolution area and the complexity of the law and things like that. After 18 years, why are you stepping down . I reached a milestone birthday and want to have enough energy for the next phase of my life really 18 years is a long time. Of your final projects has been to sketch out the complexity of the taxpayer system. We will show viewers a map here that your office has helped sketch out, why are you doing that . . We had had a roadmap as a teaching tool for my employees, a very hi