said earlier that israel was starting to lose international support, because of what he called its indiscriminate bombing of gaza. our north america correspondent shingai nyoka explains why the us voted against the resolution. it s no surprise they did that, in fact the text of this particular resolution was similar to the one that was debated on friday, with the security council where the us blocked it, vetoed it, and there really was no expectation that the us was going to vote against it. 153 con trees or member states of the un, voted in favour of this immediate call for a cease fire, or call for an immediate cease fire and those countries include india and canada. 23 countries abstained, and i think it s interesting to note that the uk is increasingly abstaining in these votes. the uk un ambassador barbara woodward said the support for israel that the uk supports israel s right to defend itself against hamas but said it must be targeted at, must be targeted to achieve th
president biden earlier said that israel was losing international support because of what he called its indiscriminate bombing of gaza. our north america correspondent shingai nyoka explains why the us voted against the resolution. it s no surprise they did that, in fact the text of this particular resolution was similar to the one that was debated on friday, with the security council where the us blocked it, vetoed it, and there really was no expectation that the us was going to vote against it. 153 countries or member states of the un, voted in favour of this immediate call for a cease fire, or call for an immediate cease fire and those countries included india and canada. 23 countries abstained, and i think it s interesting to note that the uk is increasingly abstaining in these votes. the uk un ambassador barbara woodward said the support for israel that the uk supports israel s right to defend itself against hamas but said it must be targeted at, must be targeted to achi
n.y.p.d. inspector and attorney paul morrow. you did an amazing job last night on air with our friend jesse waters, in real-time reacting to the video as it was release last night on waters prime time. now, you ve had time to reflect. what are your thoughts this morning? well, i think very clearly the tactics were way over the top. everybody is in agreement upon that. i think we re in the stage now we have to start to assess the reaction and one of the things i think worth bringing up is that we have to look larger than just the five officers fired and charged. you have to go to the top. at this point you have to start to say, is there something intrinsic to the memphis p.d. and that s not an aspersion on the men and women of memphis p.d. that are out there every day. i m talking more bureaucratically. because police departments generally take on the persona and atmospherics of their overhead, right up to the top
service? one reason is bureaucratically in those days and it s less now, and it s improved after 9/11 and the department of homeland security, remember, which the commission said that there were too many silos that led to 9/11. well, there was almost hatred between j. edgar hoover and the secret service in 1963. he didn t want to tell the secret service very much, and the other intriguing question is, we know that edgar hoover hated kennedy. was very close to lyndon johnson, who was his neighbor in washington. i m not suggesting that he deliberately did this, but you know, there may have been benign neglect that hoover may have said, okay, if kennedy is going to do these things i don t like, maybe i m not going to strain too hard to protect him, especially in a city like dallas where the violence of the radical right had been expressed. and when you think about all of this, the president of mexico helped the cia with surveillance of oswald.
their merry time as well. to allow five months to lapse with those documents sitting there? it is important to keep in mind, during that crucial period in early 22, that s when this case escalated from the archives trying on get these documents back administratively, bureaucratically, into a criminal matter. that s one of the biggest questions we had answered today. how did this get to doj? how did it become criminal? they got the boxes, they saw there were documents that were un unfoldered. word of the day. unfoldered. me, too. but to see classified documents mixed in with newspaper clippings, photos, no wonder that s alarming. and then when they realized, we didn t even get them all. trump does not care about the national archives. he does not respect it as an institute. likely wasn t familiar with it. this is what i heard from people. clearly they made it very obvious they wanted these documents back.