a lot of people were sad that it got torn down to put up this new version of the city palace because the point is why create a historical replica. of a building instead of maintaining an actual historic building ok but abouts all done and dusted this forum is well underway in the replica or i should say in the image of the kaiser s palace and now the controversy is of course it s going to house to museum collections many of the objects in them were obtained under the kaiser and some pretty dubious circumstances indeed they were and this whole thing . was taken from most african countries is the big debate right now here in germany this new museum come to know. and a lot of facts from african countries somehow if a million objects are held in bunnings ethnological collections many of them the region one thousand in full not german colony. collections are due to move into the
a lot of people were sad that it got torn down to put up this new version of the city palace because the point is why create a historical replica. of a building instead of maintaining an actual historic building ok but that s all done and dusted this forum is well underway in the replica or i should say in the image of the kaiser s palace and now the controversy is of course it s going to house two museum collections many of the objects in them were obtained under the kaiser and some pretty dubious circumstances indeed they would and this whole thing . is taken for most african countries is the big debate right now here in germany and while this new museum. and artifacts from african countries and some half a million objects are housed in bunnings ethnological connections many of them the region one thousand informant and then flown in these. collection. due to move into
today s comments that struck out to me is one of the attorneys saying she would not and could not violate her conscience. what does that mean in the context of today s order from the judge? if you can spell that out in terms of what it means for her not to violate her conscience? right well i think kim davis has demonstrated that she s willing to pay whatever consequence comes from observing her conscience. she spent six days in jail because she was not willing to voluntarily have marriage licenses under her authority and name come out of her office. what that means going forward is something that as a legal team have to read judge bunnings order carefully and talk with kim davis about her desires and what her conscience is dictating to her and then we ll decide how to move forward. but that will be kim s addition. and could that possibly mean that she s prepared to go back to jail? i think all i can say for sure is kim davis would rather go to jail than violate her
the passage of the health care bill. late today i spoke with white house senior adviser david axelrod and asked him whether the senate reconciliation bill was a done deal. that debate starts tomorrow. i m sure it will pass the senate. the question is whether the other side is going to engage in a bunch of dill tory tactics. you seem a little less confident this is going to happen. no, no, i m very confident. what i can t tell you what is efforts the other side s going to make. we ve seen in the last few weeks senator bunnings efforts to the democrats stay united, you re going to be able to get this done. i think democrats will be united. you feel like 51 votes are there? i m very confident. is vice president going to be in town all week? he s going to be in town. there to preside over the senate? he may preside over the senate. i don t think that will be necessary. we have the votes, chuck. health insurance reform is passed. the american people are ready to mov