today's comments that struck out to me is one of the attorneys saying she would not and could not violate her conscience. what does that mean in the context of today's order from the judge? if you can spell that out in terms of what it means for her not to violate her conscience? >> right well i think kim davis has demonstrated that she's willing to pay whatever consequence comes from observing her conscience. she spent six days in jail because she was not willing to voluntarily have marriage licenses under her authority and name come out of her office. what that means going forward is something that as a legal team have to read judge bunnings order carefully and talk with kim davis about her desires and what her conscience is dictating to her and then we'll decide how to move forward. but that will be kim's addition. >> and could that possibly mean that she's prepared to go back to jail? >> i think all i can say for sure is kim davis would rather go to jail than violate her