The kyiv court of appeals, where, as you might have guessed, allanyk was a judge. A competition was announced, and i cannot forbid him if there is a competition and he wants to work, exercise his constitutional right, so he really passed the competition, and when there was a question of liquidation of the Higher Specialized Court of ukraine for consideration of civil criminal cases, he was dismissed. The question of work arose again. I used to work before 2007 in the kyiv court of appeal, it was the court of appeal of the city of kyiv, now, as the legal successor said, the kyiv court of appeal, in the 21st year, it seems, he, yes, in the 21st year, he submitted documents, he passed the competition, the competition was fair, i think, because the tests were on computers, judge allainyk in that her nephew studied and worked in institutions, where. She taught and worked herself, does not see nepotism. I never even thought before that such questions might arise for me in the future, so that
The restrictions of the law, thus ukraine, based on this expert opinion, the relevant authorities , who are authorized to make decisions and will make decisions regarding the renaming or removal from the public space of certain dedicated objects bearing the name of bolgakov, at the same time it is absolutely not in any way. Refers to the Creative Work that remains and should remain open, accessible so that anyone who wants to can read, get to know, understand, analyze bolgakovs work and figures, so there is no need to mix everything into one, because this is a frank manipulation and really an attempt to protect or defend with fabricated accusations , so that bulgakov would fill him with exactly ukrainophobic things in his work. Mr. Volodymyr, what do you think, why, well, this is the third time ive seen in the last few years, when there is something related to bolgakov, and a whole wave of well, with this idea that. Bolgakov is being banned, this very word is heard, it is heard, by the