The kyiv court of appeals, where, as you might have guessed, allanyk was a judge. A competition was announced, and i cannot forbid him if there is a competition and he wants to work, exercise his constitutional right, so he really passed the competition, and when there was a question of liquidation of the Higher Specialized Court of ukraine for consideration of civil criminal cases, he was dismissed. The question of work arose again. I used to work before 2007 in the kyiv court of appeal, it was the court of appeal of the city of kyiv, now, as the legal successor said, the kyiv court of appeal, in the 21st year, it seems, he, yes, in the 21st year, he submitted documents, he passed the competition, the competition was fair, i think, because the tests were on computers, judge allainyk in that her nephew studied and worked in institutions, where. She taught and worked herself, does not see nepotism. I never even thought before that such questions might arise for me in the future, so that
The judicial control program with tatyana shustrova. Contest to the Constitutional Court. As the candidates nephew, he was promoted in the courts where she worked. I cannot forbid him. But why does the contestant law professor collect executive proceedings . The year turned out to be difficult for all of us. Congratulations, this is a Judicial Program control and as always we are talking about the main reform from which. What do our european prospects depend on, how is the new judicial power being formed in ukraine, how is the competition for the Constitutional Court of ukraine going, and who may soon occupy a high position . About all this today, but first traditionally to the news. Oleksiy tandyr, the judge of the Makariv District Court of the kyiv region, who was drunk last year, killed the National Guard soldier vadym bondarenko, who was on duty at the checkpoint. Upon entering kyiv, he allegedly tries to avoid punishment by mobilizing into the ranks of the armed forces of ukraine.
In 2008, when i was the curator of the archive of the Security Service of ukraine, how much resistance there was even within the system of the Security Service of ukraine, the essence of this resistance was that that we are not we can expose the methods of operation of the communist special services, because they can be useful, can be used everyday, it just shocked me at the time, because as a historian i knew very well what the methods of operation of the communist special services were, and it is obvious that talking about that is something. Something similar can and should be used in independent ukraine, it is an automatic recognition that ukraine is definitely far from a Democratic State and is not going to move towards some european and Democratic State, therefore one of the first steps of the new government in in 2010, under the leadership of yanukovych, the new head of the Security Service, khoroshkovsky , there was an attempt to bottle this genie again, to close these archives
The missiles, mr. Pavle, thank you for your analysis, for your thoughts, for your words, i hope that our viewers, both the authorities and our viewers took away some information, some analysis. Pavlo kishkar, officer of the armed forces of ukraine, chief of staff, deputy battalion commander, former peoples deputy. Convocation was in the espresso interview program, well, our viewers, i hope, will be stay further with espresso tv channel, and we will see you in a week in the same program, thank you, goodbye, watch this week in the collaborators program. Betrayal under the soffits. Why was the peoples artist of ukraine sentenced to 10 years in prison . Ruzhena rublyova, soloist of the kherson russian academic music and drama theater. But how to turn from a successful actor into a kremlin jester . Dont ask too many questions, this is not ukraine for you at all. Greetings, im Olena Kononenko and this is the collaborator program. About the traitors who follow the heart of a tagaman went to s
Media, literally, wherever they could, they distributed this interview, so by chance russian propagandists suddenly began to advertise the first interview in seven years with the owner of telegram, you can say that this is a case, no, you cannot say , that this is a case, rather on the contrary it can be said that it is a very long time they had no need or, you know, for a long time they did not touch their own person, who. Gave her the opportunity to develop, gave her the opportunity to show that i live there somewhere in the free world, and when it became absolutely necessary, here they finally they used this dormant agency as well, and somehow everything became clear to everyone, because pavlo durov came out with the usual narratives of russian propaganda, which the russians themselves simply spread when they say that there is no freedom of speech at events. Here everyone is oppressed in the west, and notice, at the same time somehow absolutely, well, they are not oppressing for som