tomorrow in the cnn newsroom, the former head of the pentagon s advanced aerospace threat identification program will join me. that s the team that spent more than a decade going over the video and data. why does he think this report is a rush job? that s tomorrow. we ll be right back. bring it first time i saw you, you blew my mind i got this feeling everything was alright i ve never known someone like you but when i m with you every day is brand new new new new new new new new new at carvana, we treat every customer new new new new like we would treat our own moms, with care and respect. to us, the little things are the big things. which is why we do everything in our power to make
when i swore an oath on january 3rd of the beginning of this term, i didn t swear an oath to public opinion, or to the polls. i swore an oath to the constitution. and i just wish that senator mcconnell and those around him would take the same approach. i understand what you re saying about that. but if you swore an oath to the constitution, taking actions that don t seem political might help democrats succeed in that effort more, don t you think? well, i think there are two questions weather they seem political or are characterized by people as political. that is an easy thing for people to do. but i think what the speaker is trying to do is make sure that the trial itself is not a sham. that it is not a joke. that it is not a rush job where leader mcconnell simply brings up the case, moves for dismissal and they move on. we want to make sure that the facts are presented and while we re preparing the case and determining who the managers will be, i think it is entirely
ed: let s turn to the democratic side. democrat three year long impeachment in search of articles found its way to the subject of ukraine. house democrats embarked on the most rushed, least thorough and most unfair impeachment inquiry in modern history. ed:. leader mcconnell is plotting the most rushed, unfair impeachment try in modern history. ed: the sparks are flying, both senators are accusing each other of a rush job regarding impeachment. all of this has come to a screeching halt. where do we go now? for some democratic perspective, former indiana i want you to talk about what the pastor was saying, a former democratic senator, and you
the supreme court a couple weeks ago said they would take jurisdiction over deciding whether the president had to comply with one subpoena relating to his tax returns. now here the democrats have been bent to impeach the president of the united states before the court decides this. and this means that there is a rush job to do this. and why is there a? because they want to influence the 2020 elections. they ve spent three years doing it, they ve spent millions of taxpayers dollars including the mueller report putting together this impeachment and they also have had this congress wrapped around impeachment and not doing their jobs until the dam broke this week. stop this charade, i yield back.
and legislative branches heretofore, they ve gone to court. and the supreme court a couple of weeks ago said they would take jurisdiction over deciding whether the president had to comply with one subpoena relating to his tax returns. now, here the democrats have been bent to impeach the president of the united states before the court decides this. and this means that there is a rush job to do this. and why is there? because they want to influence the 2020 elections. and they spent three years doing it. they spent millions of taxpayers dollars including the mueller report, putting together this impeachment, and they also have had this congress wrapped around impeachment and not doing their jobs until the dam broke this week. stop this charade, vote no.