43. The thing is we dont see much warming today. You can take a sneak peek at the bottom of the screen with the sevenday forecast neighborhood by neighborhood. Only cap upper 40s to right around 50. What weve got is cloudiness in our area not rain to track. Whats going to happen today like yesterday, sprinkles in the forecast, not a downpour at any point, but instead period where you might notice a lightthat the windseepes cool. The winds are notice a bit more ileperhour winds currently. 25. That continues the rest of sunday. Well go torhood in a fewews were following out of nice cl one of those victims is dead have lifethreatening injuries. The scene just outside the people were inside that club just after 1 00 this of any cinnnati has tweeted that multiple s absolutely terrorism in what theyre callingthe nbc 10 app for area mr. Is inident that sent one person to the here in the parking lot of a its unfair if outside a car or in the to find out more about that persons mornings love ru
Transfer as an opportunity to deep end security and Counter Terrorism and cooperations of the United States. We welcome that and we look to facilitate that interest word exists. Had the administration provided military training in exchange of taking in detainees and so to what extent and to which government. Not to my knowledge, paul. Maam, thats somethin something thats something we have to talk about in a closed session. Like night vision goggles or Something Like that. Again, the negotiation of security of assurances is detailed and complex and to discuss any specifics, i have to talk to you about that in closed sessions. We are happy to do so. Have the administration provided intelligent equipment or training or intelligent sharing to any government in exchange for accepting a detainee and if so to what extent and to what government . We have to talk about intelligent matter and closed session. The absence of any of these agreements would need to be discussed in a classified settin
Engage ms. Amini at every step along the way. There were some changes to the plans that were made because requirements after the Planning Department reviewed it, they made suggestions and we adopted those. I think the key point is that no part of it extends past the rear setback, and we did everything we can to be cognizant of that and minimize the impact in that part of the yard. Thats all i have to say. Okay, thank you. Mr. Sanchez . Thank you, scott sanchez, Planning Department, on the rh1d district its not a lot coverage rimer, there is setback requirements, so its not you can have a building that may need code requirements that exceeds maybe 100 lot ko rj, weve had projects like this in the past, thats because over time t zoning control can change and you have noncomplying buildings which is this is a noncomplying building and a noncomplying structure can be expand but it cannot create a new discrepancy it cannot encroach further into the rear yard and what theyre proposing here i
Theyre very concerned about that and when they heard about this conversion and how it seemed to be done out of the offices, the cochange they implemented i think that raised concerns we invest painted and found this was not properly issued. Do you have a documented permit history of what was there prior . I would say the permit history is not entirely clear i agree with the appellant to that extent but i dont have any evidence that there was a legal office use. I know thats something the appellant has argued and i can see those material ins their brief. So you say it was an art gallery for over ten years. From using google street view, it had been there last year and it was going back to 2004 or so, going back quite some time to the earliest 2008 or 2004, whatever the earliest google street images were and perhaps some of the local merchants can speak to that, three years is required as an abandonment of use. Thank you. Other questions . I think that argument similar to the one that yo
Theyre very concerned about that and when they heard about this conversion and how it seemed to be done out of the offices, the cochange they implemented i think that raised concerns we invest painted and found this was not properly issued. Do you have a documented permit history of what was there prior . I would say the permit history is not entirely clear i agree with the appellant to that extent but i dont have any evidence that there was a legal office use. I know thats something the appellant has argued and i can see those material ins their brief. So you say it was an art gallery for over ten years. From using google street view, it had been there last year and it was going back to 2004 or so, going back quite some time to the earliest 2008 or 2004, whatever the earliest google street images were and perhaps some of the local merchants can speak to that, three years is required as an abandonment of use. Thank you. Other questions . I think that argument similar to the one that yo