he s on a plane with stuff that is highly classified. he anything he wants, it turns out it wasn t the names of our undercover agents, it was the extremely classified presumably nsa material that is not the law. he is being detained under a british uk terrorism act only supposed to be used to detect and find people connected to terrorist. there is no indication that david miranda, they knew who he was and connected to a terrorist group. great britain has laws that are somewhat different and their terrorism law takes it one step farther. they said not just the material this person is a terp rorest but can be used by terrorist. if terrorist know how we surveil their cell phone calls, how we surveil their texts, that could be used. could any information published by a journalist be used and can that excuse be
detaining him for nine hours? i sure do. i don t want to be unkind, but he was a mule. he was given something, he didn t know what it was, from one person to pass to another at the other end of an airport. our prisons are full of drug mules. glenn s view is, as long as one of the two people on either end of that transaction was a journalist, he can take anything he wants. he could take the nuclear launch codes, the names of our undercover agents. this was paid for by the guardian. wasn t he acting in a journalistjournalist ic capacity? no. he s on a plane with stuff highly classified. it was the extremely classified nsa material. that is not the law. he s being detained under a british uk terrorism act, only supposed to be used to detect
glenn s view is, as long as one of the two people on either end of that transaction was a journalist, he can take anything he wants. he could take the nuclear launch codes. he could take the names of our undercover agents. this was paid for by the guardian. wasn t he acting in a journalistic capacity? no. he s on a plane with stuff highly classified. anything he wants, it turns out it wasn t the names of our undercover agents. it was the extremely classified presumedly nsa material. that is not the law. he s being detained under a british uk terrorism act, only supposed to be used to detect and find people who are connected to terrorists. there s no indication that david miranda, they knew who he was. they knew he s not connected to some terrorist group. great britain has its own laws that are similar to ours but are somewhat different.
it was the extremely classified nsa material. that is not the law. he s being detained under a british uk terrorism act, only supposed to be used to detect and find people who are connected to terrorists. there s no indication that david miranda, they knew who he was. they knew he s not connected to a terrorist group. great britain has its own laws that are similar to ours but are somewhat different. their terrorism law fakes it one step further. they say it s not just the material this person is a terrorist, but can be used by terrorists. frankly, if terrorists know how we surveil their cell phone calls, they could be used. couldn t any information published by journalists be used by terrorists? not at all. not classified information.