lenos h general knows to do that. william barr has to give a summary and there are all sorts of regulations of what you do when you choose not to charge somebody. this is the president of the united states and impeachment could be on the table and congress is interested in what findings may be there. if there is not enough to charge the president, that s what mueller has determined, what sort of obligation is william bar under to give congress what it may need for potential impeachment charges. yeah, great question, katy. there is a difference between what he must do legally and what he want to give small pea politically. legally is a brief report regarding charge decisions and small, as barr reads the paper, i should add to what pete said. there is at least four categories of stuff that i can think of that could be in the report that may not be made public. classified information, for
he has been totally silent. there are no leaks out of his office. as much as we all might try to get more information about what s in this report, it s really unknown. we think it s coming any day now. we don t have a specific point. i think that s really starting to get under the president s skin. we re seeing him lash out in ways that are even less logical than we ve seen in the past if that s possible and so he s starting to take these hits. another thing he said yesterday that didn t even make a hit on the truth bull s eye at all is whether or not the president has any control over what we see in the public. he says, i think they should release everything. well, that s not only not up to the president, it s really not up to robert mueller. it s up to the attorney general, william barr. he will get this report from mueller and then it s up to him what will go to congress. he ll have to write a brief report and then how much is actually made public. so the idea that the president is
questions and we can only hope that robert mueller will answer them in this report. harry, neal cot who helped draft the special counsel regulations, he wrote this in the new york times. it s a fascinating piece if you haven t read it yet. if e the report, unlikely to be lengthy by design. the special counsel regulations envision a report that is concise, a summary of what he found. and mr. mueller s mandate limited to look into criminal activity and counterintelligence matters surrounding russia and the 2016 election as well as any obstruction of justice relating to those investigations. a brief report. is it likely to be beneficial to the president, harry? really, a tough and interesting question. by the way, craig, those are two different points. it could be limited in that content and still write 500 pages. now it s true that the regs
the the new york times sas that it was included in a pressure relief. at the time of a 2016 rate in syria, before the story. it was covered by numeral media outlets. that says it would ve tipped off a big daddy who knew, his communication message. the fox inference segment was sheer hypocrisy, because fox also covered that two years ago when a spokesperson said, there s actually no comparison between cap and heritage is a brief report back in 2015, the newspaper report in 1,000 words, much more compromising detail and more details how he communicated and who played a role in delivering those medications, including the times reported that the terrace wife was cooperating, a spokesman for the fox also same, why did they wait a day and have to complain?
included, because it alludes to movement on the bill on the senate side. since the first bill couldn t even pass the much easier house, but around the same time, a reporter at congressional quarterly tweeted that senate gop source told him yesterday this was false. quote, the only language on the aca repeal that may be considered has been drafted by the house. then there was this report from trump tax adviser larry kudlow on cnbc. just a brief report, and this is all secondhand. but i ve been told by people down there that conservative freedom caucus member mark meadows, the chairman so-called, has been in discussion and successfully negotiating with moderate republican senator susan collins of maine, and that they re agreeing on a number of issues. so for the first time as this person reported to me, if the house can get a vote next week or soon after, the senate may jam it right through fast. a huge revelation. i mean the house and the senate working together and jam it