>> the "the new york times" sas that it was included in a pressure relief. at the time of a 2016 rate in syria, before the story. it was covered by numeral media outlets. that says it would've tipped off a big daddy who knew, his communication message. the fox inference segment was sheer hypocrisy, because fox also covered that two years ago when a spokesperson said, there's actually no comparison between cap and heritage is a brief report back in 2015, the newspaper report in 1,000 words, much more compromising detail and more details how he communicated and who played a role in delivering those medications, including the times reported that the terrace wife was cooperating, a spokesman for the fox also same, why did they wait a day and have to complain?