it s interesting she did not bring it up as soon as she heard the allegations. alluding to the clarence thomas hearing, joe biden the chairman of the committee referred that to the white house so the fbi could investigate it. the committee is in a position to investigate this. we have begun this and reached out to dr. ford and judge kavanaugh to do routine background calls. the staff would join the majority staff on these calls and they refuse to participate. shannon: you all on the committee accident democrats and republicans have staffers to complete the investigation. are you saying that the democrats are not engageing in the investigation or not joining in what you are doing? they haven t participated in this. chairman grassley led a transparent process. as soon as he heard about these allegations sunday, he moved to
they are saying allegation of sexual assault do not matter. tucker: lisa booth is a fellow at the independent women s voice. lisa the u.s. senator from hawai i , you probably saw this. said that it s not just brett kavanaugh guilty. i all men are guilty by definition because they are men. it s not that she believed ford but all when because they are all because they are women. is that the core of the feminist promise?re it s the core of the #metoo movement. remember emily linden, columnist for teen vogue and she tweeted out it s okay if innocent men are caught up in the #metoo movement because it serves a broader purpose. i fundamentally disagree with that. that is the problem with the #metoo movement, it only considers the accuser and itbl doesn t consider the accused. judge kavanaugh s life hangs in the balance here. that is my bigger problem. he won t get a fair hearing. there is to due process in court of public opinion.
policy, anonymous letter to see if the hearings derailed kavanaugh. if they didn t, she would whip it around. that would destroy kavanaugh. it didn t work. so she was left with an orwellian situation, i don t know if this is true. i will put it out there. we live in a world of jurisprudence where any of us are subject to a charge anonymous 36 years from our past we don t know the location or the time of the incident. but the accuser will tell thehe government agency thee conditions under which the accused shall be investigated. and i don t know how this is all going to react, tucker, but they think they are creating a blue wave. it may be that people where i am in central valley or western pennsylvania said you know what? that is why i voted for trump. i didn t see alternative to thes madness. or they don t want to live in that could happen. a world we live the anonymous
precedent we want to stant moving forward, someone likeeg cory booker who wrote in a college paper you tried to take advantage of a drunkf 15-year-old girl, then he is disqualified from running for office in 2020 or president. we have reached peak insanity as a country and this isde important to take a step back and examine facts to look and t and examine facts to look and realize judge kavanaugh s life also hangs in the balance. innocent men could get swept up in the entire movement. tucker: people are terrified in the country. not just guilty people. but innocent people. decent people. they are afraid of thef mob. the left is out of control. thank you. o thank you, tucker. tucker: president trump ordered declassification of the documents related to the russia investigation. he may not get his wish. bureaucracy preparing to fight back. question is who controls classified information in america? elected president or unelected bureaucrats? that s next. the beat goes on. it loo
my perpetrator didn t ask my political leaning. the bottom line is every woman or victim should be believed. 2 to 10% are being untruthful so 90% are truthful. the reason these are taken off social media. not because of what she is claiming. it s because of the doctor being listed. her patient number and other private medical information. i don t agree that every woman should be believed. but evidence should be believed am this woman has a lot more evidence than kavanaugh s accuser does and it happened a couple of years ago with eyewitnesses. not something that happened 35 years ago. leslie, your party went from being me too to me who? we should not be surprised. this is the party of bill clinton and teddy kennedy and weiner. they will deny the evidence until they can t deny it