A Boston criminal defense attorney believes he has the rare case in which a driver can plausibly argue that her “refusal” to submit to a chemical test was invalid because she was too intoxicated to comprehend officers' warnings.
A Boston criminal defense attorney believes he has the rare case in which a driver can plausibly argue that her “refusal” to submit to a chemical test was invalid because she was too intoxicated to comprehend the warnings provided by police officers pursuant to the state’s implied consent law. Superior Court Judge Robert B. Gordon,