stronger workplace protections. she takes claim and says but it s everybody s fault. that is the attitude. we saw with harvey weinstein. it s horrible. society has donated service to women here. no, you did. congresswoman, you did it. if republicans can find a way to message on it and say it s not our fault. we didn t do this. you did this, they can win. with scott talking about this, i had to check the year. is it 2016? you just replaced the name donald trump, make him the candidate. there is no way donald trump and every race, he s going to be the candidate. at 50 rating. shannon: let s bring bre. presidents historically do not do well in the first midterm after their election. i think honestly both parties are scrambling. we can see that by the fact there s been a lot of names floated. none of them are been really
conservative stations approved by the sec and doj. the code words in this document include fake news. put that aside, the reality is i don t think people are as upset about the statement because it is kind of content neutral. the reality is when your doctor knows that and compare it to sinclair, when you juxtapose and compare it to sinclair and the rantings and ravings. it s completely inconsistent with the content neutral. it s the one we have to bring in bre. why do cnn get to do these ads, they can say an apple is an apple and we know it they are inferring and it s purposely fine. [all speaking] i work with cnn a lot. shannon: i have a feeling bre has a lot to say. we have more hot topics for you. we would love for you to come back. don t go anywhere. oklahoma teachers get a raise and then go on strike.
rights have been violated. as we have seen the down side to people who are distraught or crazy taking out their problemsn the general public. we don t want that to happen. these laws are major priority for the brady campaign. they say at least 30 states are considering passing their own. shannon. shannon: dan springer from seattle. thank you so much. more states are considering passing their own laws just like that one. let s bring in tonight s panel to talk about it. scott, derek, and bre. bre, i hear from a lot of folks on the gun rights side who say with the proper due process they don t have a problem with it. i honestly have kind of conflicting feelings about it because time and time again you can see where if that had written procedures in place, people would have followed, could ve potentially prevented a mass shooting. on the other hand, what does constitute an ability to take it away? in this case, it seems a little
elizabeth esty s cover up or are her domestic violence scandal was as reprehensible as it was morally bankrupt. the nrc c is ready to win this seat this fall. democrats will be able to distance themselves from the stained esty left on their brand. keep in mind connecticut is overwhelmingly a deep blue state. it would be a major upset for any republican to end. this is a district that does tend to skew to the right than the rest of the state. in 2016, hillary clinton won by four points. it s at least within the ram of possibility that republicans could flip it. shannon: kristin fisher, good to see you. do republicans have any shot at picking up the seat? tonight, scott bolden, democratic strategist. derek hunter, and bre patent. scott, does the g.o.p. have any
bit better. no one has complained about it. in other cases, could my parent who is upset at me or another family member call and have my gun taken away for a personal matter? that s not always clear. it is something we have to wrestle with and we have to look at. i think it will be interesting to see how reactions play out in seattle and other states enacting these laws. shannon: i talked to lindsey graham and others were trying to work on something at the national level. the thing is, in his case, what he was talking about, they could take the gun before the person who is fighting and has a chance to go to the judge and make his argument. for a lot of people, that s problematic. it is putting the cart before the horse. courts rarely turn this down. i don t want to become a fisa situation. i agree with bre that it s important tool for law enforcement. i think we could all agree there are people we have to keep an eye on. if it becomes weaponized and it