republican took over new york. and the warning it sends across the country. and one week ago, he told elon musk welcome to hell. tonight, that hail-scape is a whole lot worse. as the 11th hour gets underway on friday night. good evening once again. i m stephanie ruhle. we are down to the wire. four days before the election day, and with control of the senate and the house on the line. there is no room for error. there s also no rest for the president on this final campaign weekend. president biden will be trying to get out the vote in illinois and pennsylvania. he ll have company in the keystone state for two former presidents, biden will headline a rally with president obama, while donald trump is also campaigning there this weekend. this afternoon, biden said he thinks things are looking good for democrats. we re gonna win this time around, i feel really good about our chances. we re gonna keep this and keep up a seat. we have a chance of winning the house. that s when i
index. and of exercise. it is something they practice. it is something they are very comfortable with. they have never use them for real, other than in tests. so this is something, and i think it s why the biden administration, rightfully so, in my view, has had this concern on the back of their minds since the beginning of this conflict. susan glasser, the president also said here he is trying to figure out what is putin s off ramp. where does he find a way out here? where does he find himself in a position that he does not only lose face but also lose significant power within russia? that s the presidents quote. putin has backed himself into a corner. how does he get out of it? i think that is one of the words, when i hear off ramp and american officials talking about putin, because again and again and again, putin has showed over the last two decades that he is heedless, largely, of american efforts to guide him in any direction and off-ramps are not appreciated. one t
weissmann, neil cattle, and bradley moss, right here, right now, who were scheduled to lead off our discussion, and now, we really have twice as much to discuss this we thought. we are all in good hands with that. i will be watching you on the television, and very interesting breaking news. thank you. the name of the case is, appropriately, donald j trump versus united states of america. that, really, is what this is. but, in that case, the united states of america turned the tables by filing a motion, asking, but really, demanding, that the judge in the case reverse her recent ruling. so, for at least the next week or so, or more, this case has become the united states of america versus judge aileen mercedes cannon, who stands, accused, in effect, in the justice department of committing judicious malpractice, in her last ruling in the case, in which he issued an order, requiring a so-called special master, to be named later, to review all evidence in the case, includin
which that they could indict somebody on, including him? that s the first question. and i think they re getting very close to that point, frankly. but i think at the end of the day, there s another question, it s do you indict a former president? what will that do to the country? what kind of precedent will that set? will the people really understand that this is not failing to return a library book? that this was serious? you have to worry about those things. and i hope that those kinds of factors will inclined the administration not to indict him. because i don t want to see him indicted. it comes as we re learning that the documents seized from mar-a-lago s resort including one on a former government s nuclear capabilities. that s according to the washington post. i want to bring in the former nick akerman, nationalistic bradley moss and cnn political analyst kirsten powers. good to see all three of you. nick, i m gonna start with you. bill barr there. saying that he
the former attorney general, bill barr, weighing in on a potential indictment of donald trump. here s what he said on fox earlier. i think, as i ve said all along, there are two questions. will the government be able to make out a technical case? will they have evidence by which that they could indict somebody on, including him? that s the first question. and i think they re getting very close to that point, frankly. but i think at the end of the day, there s another question, it s do you indict a former president? what will that do to the country? what kind of precedent will that set? will the people really understand that this is not failing to return a library book? that this was serious? you have to worry about those things. and i hope that those kinds of factors will incline the administration not to indict him. because i don t want to see him indicted. it comes as we re learning that the documents seized from mar-a-lago s resort including one on a former government