Of writing, making things come alive in a fair, relevant way, youre going to find a position. Thank you. You bet. Thanks for being here. Real quickly. Yes or no, michael, is that it . Just yes or no. Im kelly mcgowan. I have another ethics question. What do you do to get everybody on your staff on the same page ethically . Get everybody on the same page ethically . Like what do you do to ensure your staff is all on the same page constant coaching, transparency. Here is what is expected if you want to work for me, and if you cant live by those rules, you wont. Okay. Lets face it, ethics is a nonnegotiable thing, okay . Its not. Michael, you know that certainly in your classes and what it is youre teaching. Its nonnegotiable conversations related to the ethics. You want to be in this business, to be credible, relevant to the readers and advertisers i serve, you dont play by the ethics game, youre not going to work for us. Thank you. My name is nicole. Im in a Research Class and our littl
For those you have served i0z the government, you know how delicious that is. Jcrp÷ its necessary. We are welcomingczsoy i said in myv u. Remarks, we want to work with nonNuclear Weapon states as well asl fw Nuclear Weapon states and so were at this point open minded about who will be participating. Ihx n also want to sandnc y however that £n hope en,3f . Invigorate the work the p5 because we also think its very important that the Nuclear Weapon states develop some sophisticated simq9 9 ofigfod these mao2. In the last year, we have had success in establishing a pe7zs working group1cfgh that meets in 6rt vienna at the same time that working group b is thevx o÷ Verification Working Group that deals with a comprehensive test treaty and looks at technical verification issues in that i think its fine for the p5 to begin work n focussing on ctbt verification because that provides a lot of veryn Technical Information that can then in the future be broadened out in other directions so the V
So more than doubles. The International Panel on Climate Change has actually put more emphasis in this. If youre trying to hit a 550 target and you take ccs off the table, the cost goes up about 50 or really goes up between sort of 30 and 80 for 550. If you want to hit a 450 target the cost triples. Goes up between 200 and 400 . Thats a lot of money, and its just because in some markets coal with ccs is the cheap option. Not everywhere, maybe not in california, maybe not in arizona, but in a whole bunch of markets, in a whole bunch of places in the country and around the world, ccs with coal is the cheapest option for deep abatement, and if you get rid of that cheapest option, you have to replace it with something more costly or less efficient. The good news is weve made a lot of progress on this. This slide is actually a little old, but basically the lower two bars are stuff thats built and operating or will be operating soon because its being built. So right now were here at 2015, we
Point will the administrationa reconsider linking its own the size of the u. S. Stockpile with the size ofdnbym russias stockpile and just accept nuclear postureg recommended judgmentwaen the u. S. Can get ÷ by with a smallerd,xn arsenal┌n i believe the question about unilateral reductions and i will say as ive said repeatedlys9 4 includingb4azjw in public testimony that8 unilateral reductions are noax the table. not on the 7n i can say. Ja 4n h 4q< yes, good morning. Tim gent from the defense threat reductionq thank you for all your hard work madame secretary. As a member2xfn and treaty imply8 meanter, we sit back and look at somes 7 of the effect treaty year five, six, and out to 2018. As we see the likelihood of new sanctions being announced as early friday do you believero that the willing0rpw to sacrifice all. Zch the hard work that your office has done yc over thequq years aroundczm]p euu zm5 continue with sanctions or[zcwcl can remain separate and continue on separate paths t
Viable in the philippines. Again, human behavior. Its taken them ten years to pass the Renewable Energy act. Its taken them another five years. Human behavior effects this. And i think theres a lot of opportunities where asia can do better. Biofuels, and i call this more efficient use of coal. When i was in charge of the clean energy program, i got hammered i used to get hammered all the time by grease peace, because it was called the asian dams and bridges bank and we finance a lot of coal, they say its changed. But they use to hammer us all the time and say, no, you cant use clean coal because youre whitewashing the problem. Theres no such thing as clean coal. Coal is dirty. And so we in the peace treaty we decided that whenever we talk about clean coal, supposed to call it more efficient use of coal. When i say more efficient use of coal, i mean ccs. And we have some funding from the ccs institute. And weve been working in india, china, vietnam and chio on the for ccs. And weve been