right now. the people in that meeting is pretty significant if bolton s account is true. if it s true, correct. that s an important if. this is why, you know, house i know the president has said that the house didn t call bolton. it is true that they didn t take him to court over it, and then bolton said he would comply with a subpoena from the senate. this is why people who want witnesses are arguing it would be important to get bolton under oath. we should also note that the white house has argued that bolton, who was often at odds with mick mulvaney and with secretary of state mike pompeo, that bolton himself, you know, was a disgruntled employee on bad terms and had an ax to grind, which is why the importance of being under oath matters. but there are all kinds of complications of bolton testifying. it s not just the question of
impeachable but it acknowledges that it was wrong. we didn t hear hurd others say it was wrong. i think republicans senators will grab ahold of this, it s not proven. they ll take the approach of a criminal defense attorney that the house didn t prove its case. you don t have the president in his open words. what obviously complicate has is you don t have mulvaney or pompeo or bolton testifying. the white house is prohibiting any proving of the facts but i think that s where the senate may arrive. is that the house didn t prove its case. didn t prove its case, overheard, hearsay, whatever. even though gordon sondland talked to the president himself. that s a fact witness. i mean that s right. it s indisputable what happened. the only question they can raise is is this impeachable or so close to the election the trial if it takes place is going to be in january. and whether it s short or long it won t start until january at the earliest. and that s already bumping up