And in no event shall debate continue beyond 11 50 a. M. Each member other than the majority and minority leaders and the minority whip shall be limited to five minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Schiff, for five minutes. Mr. Speaker, on may 16, a group of Peaceful Protesters gathered at a public park outside the turkish ambassadors residence in northwest washington, d. C. They came from a variety of backgrounds, armenian, kurdish, yazidi and more. But they shared a common concern about developments in turkey, including the crackdown on political opposition and free speech in that country and turkeys continued denial of the armenian genocide. About a mile away, turkeys president , erdogan, was received warmly by President Trump at the white house. The protesters felt and rightly so that they had to exercise their First Amendment rights and raise their voices in dissent, the very dissent that has been squelch by erdogan in his own country. What happened nex
That has trouble adjusting to the military members. It is a new face. Donald trump was elected because he is different. He is bringing in a different staff. Reince priebus, is a nice guy. He is party with a relic we beat with donald trump. He was brought in to bridge the gap between paul ryan and white house, didnt happen. Health care failed. Now he is bringing in something, bringing in the new muscle. He works well with military guys. Neil you have to be a i believe to tell them, carl, you cant do this sir, not a good idea, sir. I dont think general kelly will have any problem telling anyone what is on his mine. Neil fine. Is the president going to listen to that . That is the question. Neil i asked that question, higby. Do you think that will happen or what . I do. Neil i can do that because youre remote but go ahead. I do think he will listen. Donald trump respects the military more than just about anyone else on that Political Landscape so i think he will. I love carl, but i think
Full distribution. We have to compete. As an independent network, i feel the pain that miss ziman feels. At access tv we gear ourselves as a Music Network geared toward the 45plus. We dont like to tell our advertisers that but thats who watches more tv and its a challenge for to us get distribution, but with the new methods of distribution like directv now, and others, in a has opened the door. In the past, the distribution was constrained, as miss ziman mentioned because of band width. You couldnt put on another High Definition network particularly with standard definition which took up even more band width. Now new methods of distribution, theres new hope. Theres more hope for independent Networks Like ours, and i think this merger opens up doors. As an example on directv now, access tv is distributed in their 35 bundle. Hd net movies is not. Weve got to do a better job at hd net movies to convince them to carry us. That onus is on me. To your point earlier its very competitive. Its
No, i think the universities do make progress on this and i think you get to a point where you create a Virtuous Cycle and i think it does work and i think theres reason to believe that it does work. I think the key point, representative compelling interest, thats in the heartland of what the court has said. In which the universities expertise the process point before you said also said that a matter to which this court, some, but not what youre talking about is the need of the program. In addition to that, and this is what id like you to focus on because there could be a question of whether to send it back for more evidence or not. So, in looking through the records so far, on this specifically, i found an affidavit by a person named walker and that person named walker ascribed seven years of efforts measure this stuff. All kinds of discussions. Described conclusions of the faculty members and the admissions offices. That you did need. You did need. Affirmative action in the 25 of the
Aliens, this is law, voted on by this body, signed into law by a president by the United States, elected by the people, aliens present in the u. S. In violation of immigration code are breaking the law and reportable. Thats u. S. Law. Thats not the majoritys opinion. Thats not a partys opinion. Thats not an individuals opinion. Thats the law of this land. You can disagree with those laws. You can disagree with the terminology. But that is the law. Thats the law. Fact, to the point that arizona vs. United states, 2012, Justice Sotomayor, quote, so how where do they get the records that show that this person is an illegal alien . Thats not authorized to be here . Now, was she being racist . Demeaning . Dehumanizing . I dont think so. I dont think so. I dont agree with all her decisions. But i dont believe that that was her intent when she made those had that question there. Ill point out this provision, maybe i should read it again. Ill read it again. For the Ranking Member. Because to t