The Appeals Court hearing on Donald Trumps Immunity Hearing has wrapped up. The threejudge appellant panel facing this big question can the former president be held criminally responsible for actions that he took while in office to overturn the 2020 election loss. We heard a remarkable argument from trumps team who heard the argument that prosecuting a former president would open up a pandoras box as john sauer said that working in the capacity as alleged in the indictment by jack smith, the Special Counsels office pushing back on that. This notion that we are all of the sudden going to be seeing a floodgate, i think that, again, the careful investigations in the clinton era didnt result in any charges. The fact that this investigation did doesnt reflect that we are going to see a sea change of vindictive titfortat prosecutions in the future. I think it reflects fundamentally unprecedented nature of the criminal charges here. Cnns evan perez joins us now. Evan, you were inside of that
billionaire. my view is, he broke the law. you have to be held accountable. tonight, the incredible story of sam alito, the giant salmon, the private plane, the billionaire with business before the court. and toledo scrambling attempt to knock down the story. that, mueller investigation revealed that russia interfered in the 2016 when trump s special counsel goes under oath again you can hold yourself out as an objective justice official, or as a partisan hat. the more that you chart try to spin the facts and not answer my questions, you sound like the letter. kevin mccarthy loses the not answer questions, you sound like the. latter plus, kevin mccarthy loses control of the house after republicans censure the former chair of the intelligence committee. [crowd chanting] shame, shame, shame! and how pennsylvania managed to fix a collapsed interstate in less than two weeks. this is what it looks like when the ingenuity of delco meets the grit of phill
get to what matters in the iowa results tonight. it is a win for trump and that is undeniably true, but it is not yet the unified party that this very well-known prominent ex-president hoped for and you know how pundits get things wrong. they re narratives and then they push them on everyone and sometimes they re echoed and spun by the trump wing of the party. that s happening again, and trump has been dubbed everything from a knockout to a success. a closer look under the hood looks like a mixed picture and here s how the new results came in. and here we go! are you ready or not? it is a big wild card in iowa this evening and that s the weather. it s the fox news decision desk can now project that former president donald trump will win the iowa caucuses. it is likely to be a decisive outcome. we are going to suspend this presidential campaign. i really think this is time you in for everybody, our country to come together. bottom line, in this business you are e
justice caught accepting lavish gifts from a from the billionaire. my view is, he broke the law. you have to be held accountable. tonight, the incredible story of sam alito, the giant salmon, the private plane, the billionaire with business before the court. and toledo scrambling attempt to knock down the story. that, mueller investigation revealed that russia interfered in the 2016 when trump s special counsel goes under oath again you can hold yourself out as an objective justice official, or as a partisan hat. the more that you chart try to spin the facts and not answer my questions, you sound like the letter. kevin mccarthy loses the like the letafter republicans ce former chair of the intelligence committee. and how pennsylvania managed to finish a collapse interstate in less than two weeks. this is what it looks like when the ingenuity of delco meets the grit of philly and we work together to get it done. but all in, starts right. now. good eve
support. i m michael smerconish in philadelphia. monday america celebrates the third ever federal holiday of juneteenth, commemorating the emancipation of enslaved african americans. as we do, the consensus among legal scholars is the supreme court will soon be ending affirmative action, at least in the context of college admissions. does that mean it achieved its purpose or we re abandoning the underlying premise? a pair of cases have been argued. we ll soon know the results. one involves harvard, the other the university of north carolina. the conventional wisdom is that race-conscious admissions will end. currently race is permitted to be a factor, meaning one factor among many to be considered as schools seek to create a diverse student body. kwoet quote teas, however, are unconstitutional. that s the bottom line after the supreme court has taken up several cases involve ing affirmative action over time. justice sandra day o connor wrote we expect 25 years from now the us