Air force reserve and i may chaplain who served in iraq. The issues that came up for me, and some of this may be a followup on my colleague you just mentioned, but you brought are note the fact they going back to the same afghanistan that they left. They would not have the impact they could have had. , whatntelligence information, what would have you believe that they could not get set up in a country that has not changed much in 400, 500 years . Afghanistan both as Intelligence Officer and as a civilian adviser where they work with senior officials every day, there have been a great number of changes if just in the last decade alone. Of the networks these individuals had when they were a force fighting against the Northern Alliance though longer exist. Many of the taliban leadership are dead and i believe the app can people have changed. You have seen in the recent open defiance of threats to kill people who would go through. 40 of the voters, i believe were women who were told not to
It so requires. Dont be fooled, she said. Only the Supreme Court so required. The federal arbitration act was never meant to produce this outcome. In the hands of todays majority, arbitration threatens to become more nearly the opposite, a mechanism easily made to block the vindication of meritorious federal claims and insulate wrongdoers from liability. The court thus undermines the federal arbitration act no less than it does the sherman act and other federal statutes providing rights of action. So, commissioner wright, in your written testimony you argue that the courts should set the rules of the road for internet openness through antitrust law. But how could a complaint of anticompetitive behavior even reach the courts if its lawful to force every consumer, Small Business and employee to arbitrate their claims in a foreign venue that is secret, thats for profit. Youre familiar with the arbitration process . No jury trial, no right to appe appeal. How does your opinion about how th
Meritorious federal claims and insulate wrongdoers from liability. The court thus undermines the federal arbitration act no less than it does the sherman act and other federal statutes providing rights of action. So, commissioner wright, in your written testimony you argue that the courts should set the rules of the road for internet openness through antitrust law. But how could a complaint of anticompetitive behavior even reach the courts if its lawful to force every consumer, Small Business and employee to arbitrate their claims in a foreign venue that is secret, thats for profit. Youre familiar with the arbitration process . No jury trial, no right to appe appeal. How does your opinion about how the internet should be regulated fare in comparison to, or in light of that Supreme Court ruling . I appreciate the question. Im going to give you two quick answers. One is there is nothing in that decision that would preclude the ftc or the doj from bringing in a case. We are not in arbitra
Did that and use went way up and states that dont require it very few doctors look at the database. A doctor thinks they know what an addict looks like. They think they know what somebody with this disease looks like and they dont. Thank you very much, everybody. I think it was a very good hearing and we have got some very good notes and food for thought, so thank you very much. Its appreciated and the hearing is adjourned. Taking a look at the prime time lineup on cspan tonight, a special program on the use of consumer drones. From taking your picture, mapping construction sites to cleaning the outsides of highrise buildings. All things drones are being used for these days. On cspan2 tonight, book tv, well focus on some of 2014s nonfiction best sellers including Lynne Cheneys book on president James Madison and also starts at 8 00 p. M. Eastern. Cspan3, American History tv with u. S. Foreign policy. Well examine americas response to totalitarianism and the ra juan dan genocide. Now ke
Tougher provision on search and seizure. So Law Enforcement people are very practical. To give a general answer to it you would have to be specific place by place. Would it overwhelm the state is that what youre talking about . No. As a general matter, we ought to defer to the states. One of the previous witnesses said in ascertaining, when you go through the list of things that you ought to consider, the differential in penalties was not on their list of things that were legitimate to consider. Do you agree with that . No. That you can pick and choose your jurisdiction based on the absolutely. We did it. Well, yeah, did you it. We did it. The question was an we did it in richmond. People brag about the fact that project exile worked. I have an article against project exile. Without pointing out that the crime rate went down but in other cities in virginia that didnt have project exile, the crime rate went down more. Exactly. I pointed that out in my article. You mentioned a notice. Ha