And by bloomberg, a provider of multimedia news and Information Services worldwide. Captioning sponsored by Rose Communications from our studios in new york city, this is charlie rose. Rose jeff fager is here, hes the executive producer of 60 minutes. This year marks the 50th anniversary of the cbs broadcast. The news show was created in 1968. Its won 20 peabody awards. Fager has written a to book about the history of the legendary program. It is called 50 years of 60 minutes the inside story of televisions most influential broadcast. Heres a look at 60 minutes over the past 50 years. Good evening. This is 60 minutes. Where did it come from. Its a kind of magazine for television. Congressman, steve kroft with 60 minutes. I dont want to do 60 minutes. I stopped the interview. Asked him some questions. Im scott pelley from 60 minutes. Oh, great. I want to ask you about the twitting. Youre not very popular in the country right now, to be frank youre right. I dont care what they say. Mr. P
And by bloomberg, a provider of multimedia news and Information Services worldwide. Captioning sponsored by Rose Communications from our studios in new york city, this is charlie rose. Rose jeff fager is here, hes the executive producer of 60 minutes. This year marks the 50th anniversary of the cbs broadcast. The news show was created in 1968. Its won 20 peabody awards. Fager has written a to book about the history of the legendary program. It is called 50 years of 60 minutes the inside story of televisions most influential broadcast. Heres a look at 60 minutes over the past 50 years. Good evening. This is 60 minutes. Where did it come from. Its a kind of magazine for television. Congressman, steve kroft with 60 minutes. I dont want to do 60 minutes. I stopped the interview. Asked him some questions. Im scott pelley from 60 minutes. Oh, great. I want to ask you about the twitting. Youre not very popular in the country right now, to be frank youre right. I dont care what they say. Mr. P
Any questions. Weve tried to be transparent with the department of dbi and planning to move this forward. I think the issue before you is actually a very, very simple issue. As i understand it, this is an appeal from the categorical exemption of seekwa, it is not a rereview of everything that went on before the board of appeals and Planning Department. There is a lot that has gone on that you are not privy to. I will address the two questions by the supervisors just recently as i go through this, but the log does not support the appellant, the law says if they have done proper analysis and there is substantial evidence that supports them, and there is no new construction or major changed condition, then theyre findings are supposed to be affirmed and thats what the law says. The facts of this case actually support irving that the planning everything that the Planning Department has said and that this is categorically exempt. This hearing is about the categorical exemption, not everythi
Any questions. Weve tried to be transparent with the department of dbi and planning to move this forward. I think the issue before you is actually a very, very simple issue. As i understand it, this is an appeal from the categorical exemption of seekwa, it is not a rereview of everything that went on before the board of appeals and Planning Department. There is a lot that has gone on that you are not privy to. I will address the two questions by the supervisors just recently as i go through this, but the log does not support the appellant, the law says if they have done proper analysis and there is substantial evidence that supports them, and there is no new construction or major changed condition, then theyre findings are supposed to be affirmed and thats what the law says. The facts of this case actually support irving that the planning everything that the Planning Department has said and that this is categorically exempt. This hearing is about the categorical exemption, not everythi
1985, you brought forth the original notice of violation . The reason is, nobody was able to use the garages. As roger was talking about the back door and photographs here prove, it was impossible to use the garages. They were built in 1997. There is no proof they were built at separate moments in time. Do you have something on the projector . I apologize. Can you show tv what is on the projector. And can you step back, please, thank you. Thank you, president breed. So basically, the people who built the garage just after the yes sold it, talked to about the permit. What year was this . Fall of 1997 approximately. And they were building them together. They were not built separately, they were built together. Yeah. And when they finished them, i asked them if they had a permit, nothing ever came through, nothing was done. And then it was clear to them, the owners themselves, it was impossible to use the garages. Like all of us in small spaces, we go on with our lives when nothing is bot