Mark Hello America i am mark levin this is life, Liberty Levin sunday. Thank you for being here we have two great Guest Congressman Chip Roy who needs no introduction. We have his former boss senator ted cruz who needs no introduction. But before we get there lets talk about the border and immigration. When ways are typically not discussed you keep hearing this term hr two. Hr two. Ten months ago republicans in the House Of Representatives passed a bill. It walose a bill to secure the r it was called secure The Border Act Real Potential Law passed by the House Of Representatives and sent to the United States senate. You know what the United States and it did with that . See this, they did that they killed 10 months ago. They could have had Border Security law which truly was the strictest, most aggressive Border Security law ever passed by either house of congress. Rick could have put in place the republicans in the house did it because joe biden was not following the existing law whic
Mark Hello America i am mark levin this is life, Liberty Levin sunday. Thank you for being here we have two great Guest Congressman Chip Roy who needs no introduction. We have his former boss senator ted cruz who needs no introduction. But before we get there lets talk about the border and immigration. When ways are typically not discussed you keep hearing this term hr two. Hr two. Ten months ago republicans in the House Of Representatives passed a bill. It lose a bill to secure the bor it was called secure The Border Act Real Potential Law passed by the House Of Representatives and sent to the United States senate. You know what the United States and it did with that . See this, they did that they killed 10 months ago. They could have had Border Security law which truly was the strictest, most aggressive Border Security law ever passed by either house of congress. Rick could have put in place the republicans in the house did it because joe biden was not following the existing law whic
Mark hello america i am mark levin this is life, Liberty Levin sunday. Thank you for being here we have two great Guest Congressman Chip Roy who needs no introduction. We have his former boss senator ted cruz who needs no introduction. But before we get there lets talk about the border and immigration. When ways are typically not discussed you keep hearing this term hr two. Hr two. Ten months ago republicans in the House Of Representatives passed a bill. It walose a bill to secure the r it was called secure The Border Act Real Potential Law passed by the House Of Representatives and sent to the United States senate. You know what the United States and it did with that . See this, they did that they killed 10 months ago. They could have had Border Security law which truly was the strictest, most aggressive Border Security law ever passed by either house of congress. Rick could have put in place the republicans in the house did it because joe biden was not following the existing law whic
Any questions. Weve tried to be transparent with the department of dbi and planning to move this forward. I think the issue before you is actually a very, very simple issue. As i understand it, this is an appeal from the categorical exemption of seekwa, it is not a rereview of everything that went on before the board of appeals and Planning Department. There is a lot that has gone on that you are not privy to. I will address the two questions by the supervisors just recently as i go through this, but the log does not support the appellant, the law says if they have done proper analysis and there is substantial evidence that supports them, and there is no new construction or major changed condition, then theyre findings are supposed to be affirmed and thats what the law says. The facts of this case actually support irving that the planning everything that the Planning Department has said and that this is categorically exempt. This hearing is about the categorical exemption, not everythi
Any questions. Weve tried to be transparent with the department of dbi and planning to move this forward. I think the issue before you is actually a very, very simple issue. As i understand it, this is an appeal from the categorical exemption of seekwa, it is not a rereview of everything that went on before the board of appeals and Planning Department. There is a lot that has gone on that you are not privy to. I will address the two questions by the supervisors just recently as i go through this, but the log does not support the appellant, the law says if they have done proper analysis and there is substantial evidence that supports them, and there is no new construction or major changed condition, then theyre findings are supposed to be affirmed and thats what the law says. The facts of this case actually support irving that the planning everything that the Planning Department has said and that this is categorically exempt. This hearing is about the categorical exemption, not everythi