from washington tonight. thank you as always for being with us. university of destruction. that s the focus of tonight s angle not colleges and universities raising money work to appeal to the donors, to the alums and the perspective students by talking about their mission and their core values. for me, they re our commitments to excellence, to opportunity, and to impact. those three together are really the ones that propel us into the future. laura: a commitment to excellence? literally, no one who saw her testify last week, who has watched what happened at harvard over the past 20 plus years can say that excellence conveys objective merit and we all see that the best often loses out to the mediocre and harvard at elsewhere because the best isn t diverse enough. internally to our own community, i see my role as being the person who is always looking beyond the horizon to what s coming but also what can be. and then figuring out how to ready the campus and the campus co
angle from washington tonight. thank you,s as always, for being with you gos. university of destruction, the focus of tonight s angle. colleges, universities spend a lot of time raising money and work to appeal to the donors, to alums and perspective students by talking about their mission and their core values. those three propel us into the future. laura: a commitment to excellence? no one who saw her testify last week or watched harvard for the last 20 plus years can say that, the best lose out to mediocre at harvard and elsewhere because diverse is not good enough. i m the person always looking beyond the horizon to what is coming and what can be and ready the campus and campus community for the future. laura: doing this does not make it less gibberish, it is milk/toast language written by consultants and ms. gay didn t think her diversity eequity and inclusion prepares for the real world. it fosters resentment that makes harvard students less likely to suc
cross it off the time in public service and there s no better example of that than hunter biden who had no experience and oil and gas against the lucrative congress in ukraine. contract in ukraine. the lucrative deal in china, avcoincidentally, after his fatr leaves the foreign relation both of the country or visits they are in the case of china, this is at the center. when hillary clinton had her emailem problem in the bleach bidding and all of this came out, cnn, and msnbc, they did their best to hide it. i was a contributor at the time. i saw it happen, the scandals to hide it from the american people. but i can tell you this, the american people are smart, they see through its, and will see the scandals for what it is likely did with the hillary clinton. tammy: i think one of the things that s different and all of that and were discussing here, it s social media. its cable television. the fact that real-time now you can see the news on the smartphone. you can get information as
in, they are enraged and they cross it off the time in public service and there s no better example of that than hunter biden who had no experience and oil and gas against the lucrative congress in ukraine. the lucrative deal in china, coincidentally, after his father leaves the foreign relation both of the country or visits they are in the case of china, this is at the center. of when hillary clinton had her email problem in the bleach bidding and all of this came out, cnn, and as bc, they did their best to hide it. if i saw it happen, the scandalo hide it from the american people. at the american people are smart, they see through its, and will see the scandals for what t is likely did with the hillary clinton. tammy: i think one of the things that s different and all of that and were discussing here, it s social media. its cable television. if the fact that real-time now you can see the news on the smartphone. you can get information as it s occurring. maybe the hunter biden thing
bleach bidding. when you listen to james comey back in july of 2016, you really thought that she was gel to get indicted. this is a closed case. there is no reason why the department of justice should hold back any documents from. steve: why are they? the key you need to listen for today i guarantee you the department of justice will tout how many documents they are turning over. the question that trey gowdy always asks which is the right one is what percentage of the documents. you want 100 percent of the truth on a closed case, then turn over all the documents. but i don t think they re going to do that. they have been asking for these documents under subpoena since august. and they still haven t gotten it. steve: it is the deep state. it is the deep state. i was skeptical what that means having lived through it is very real. brian: let s talk about fusion gps. they wrote editorial overall rebuke to the republicans who they say are not being transparent about fusion gps. fusion