it should have been very easy for disney to just say a blanket statement we remain apolitical. we will not get involved in this. of course that s not what they did. it s pretty clear based on the statements that disney put out. is they didn t bother to actually read what is in this bill. neither did the mainstream media who has been pushing the don t say gay bill. i mean, we will talk about that in a second. neither did the folks that were protesting disney to do something about this. for anyone interested, ainsley, you just said it, it s the parental rights bill. it s not the don t say gay bill. gay isn t even in there. all this bill says is disney is interested in listening to it because i think they may want to hear this is that in the state of florida, you are not allowed in public schools to talk about sex or sexual orientation with kindergartens, first graders, second great graders and third graders, basic stuff. that is common sense, i don t know why would be discussing
she directly involved with one of the litigants. but as far as january 6 goes if jenny thomas were going to sue the committee to prevent the release of more messages from her, that would be one thing. but they generally six committees and some other litigation for some other completely different reason, that has no bearing on justice clarence thomas and certainly he would not issue a blanket statement in advance to recuse. he would wait to see what the case with the specific controversy is and make a decision. paul: sedan, on that point we do not know justice thanks about all this but he has the question becomes do the political views of his wife, whatever they are, reflect or influence impartiality of the justice white clarence thomas when he is ruling on a case. do we have reason to believe that as the senators suggest that somehow there is an
The former Keeping Up with the Kardashians star, who drew backlash earlier this month, insists that her controversial advice about success was taken out of context.
subpoenaed phil waldron, who s that guy, a retired army colonel who contributed to this powerpoint presentation about how overturn the election results on january 6th. i want to go straight to sahil kapur on capitol hill, glenn kirschner, msnbc legal analyst, and pbs newshour correspondent yamiche alcindor and of course the moderator of washington week tonight on pbs. i cannot imagine that roger stone will have anything to say. he ll use any excuse to have cameras in front of him. but talk to us about this army colonel. a powerpoint presentation. what was he going to do with that? fax it somewhere? first on roger stone, the deposition is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. roger stone may show up, he is expected to, but not expected to cooperate in any form or fashion. he has suggested that he ll plead the fifth amendment as a blanket statement and refusing to answer questions. we know from the jeffrey clark situation that the committee chairman, bennie thompson, does not expect that. he ex
speaking that you might not be on the same page about something as important as running again together and certainly she knows the country is watching the palace intrigue, whatever you want to call it. it is still news that she has had problems behind the scenes with her own team. yeah. i think she should be speaking in one voice with whatever the press secretary. harris: why do you think it is not happening? there are many speculations why it could be happening. what we also don t know is if the press secretary and the office of the president have asked her to make a blanket statement just to put reporters in news commentators at bay. i fully believe they are having conversations about the future of this country. harris: wait a minute. i think you broke news there. are you saying the white house would ask her to lie? no, i didn t say that. harris: if you are sure they are having conversations because it would make sense they would be if the white