calling it a national embarrassment, wolf. so he s not drawing a blanket statement, saying that these prosecutors should get off the hook, but he is making the observation, he feels, that there are differences and he thinks it s worth pointing out. very interesting, indeed. whitney, thank you very much. whitney wild reporting. let s get some insight from our legal analyst, eliot williams. what s your reaction to the judge s decision that the january 6th rioters, at least some of them, are being treated more harshly or unfairly? look, wolf, we have to get off of this fantasy that exists in america that federal judges are not political figures. because he was making a broad point that we should all agree with that, yeah, all defendants should be treated equally. he could make that point without calling attention to another politically charged matter. it s rank, naked politics coming from someone tonight federal bench. because he said, they were being treated differently than the ri
the january 6th documents. is that a blanket statement? are you evaluating the request from the investigation group coming in one by one? to not asserting executive privilege. obviously some of this is predicting what we don t know yet. that s his overarching view. is there something you would not turn over? i don t think i will get ahead of a hypothetical. that s important for people to know and understand. that s the principle with which we are approaching this. on the government shutdown any determination as to what happens to on-going covid related work during a potential shutdown? we obviously want to avoid a government shutdown. because it s public health work
quayle interrupts, just don t, just stop. pence pressed again. it was easy for quayle to make a blanket statement from political winter. he wanted to know whether there was a glimmer of light legally or constitutionally to perhaps put a pause on the certification if there were ongoing court cases and legal challenges. quote, forget, quayle repeated again. we are back with bob woodward and robert costa. whether intentional or not i don t know whether there was any reporting that made pence look so horrible, so pa threat knick the lens of history and quayle so valiant. tell me more about this interaction. we approached this project as reporters trying to tell the story. what really happened. and the pence story in our view had not been fully told. we wanted to cast our net as widely as possible about that process. in the course of reporting, we found out one of the calls vice president pence made during the navigation of the pressure
Kann Bier schlecht werden? Das bedeutet das Mindesthaltbarkeitsdatum wirklich infranken.de - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from infranken.de Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
blanket statement from political winter. he wanted to know whether there was a glimmer of light legally or constitutionally quayle repeated forget it. pence finally agreed acting to overturn the election would be antithetical to his traditional view of conservatism. one man could not effectively throw the election to the house of representatives. quayle told pence to let it go. mike, don t even talk about it he said. pence paused, you don t know the position i m in, he said. even if you re someone like mike pence who s very invested in publicly assuaging and placating your boss, if you re really admitted to rule of law and you re just trying to make trump less mad at you, it s going to hurt to call dan quayle.