been quite a bit of public speculation but i think the most commonly proffered speculation is that germany is very uncomfortable with having german tanks fighting russian forces on ukrainian soil and so forth. i don t think that explanation has tended to add up that much, so it is a bit of a mystery. if scholz tomorrow, as expected, announces the tanks, with the same result, so it is a bit mystifying. is this a significant moment, do you think? i think it is significant. on the one hand, look, tanks are important, they re not everything, but main battle tanks are important and ukrainian tanks are running out and the leopard 2 tank is one of the most capable. many talk about the american tank, the abrams, but the leopard 2 is most wanted. and the russians have tanks as well. so this significance is linked to the perception that by the russians and ukrainians appear to be planning offences later
he makes the argument afghanistan withdrawal, that could be utilized, he makes the argument also about hunter biden. if hunter biden, is under investigation in the fbi. and he s found charge of the crime. what the legal investigative process play out. it s not that hard to say out loud. let the legal and investigative processes play out. i find it mystifying, you have frivolous, impeachment articles drawn up by marjorie taylor greene and lauren bulb are, and the like. we re not getting into policy, why can we get into policy. like dr. greer mentioned, things that are going to affect their constituents. why are we talking about these things that are not substantial. i want to get back to talking about policy. things that impact. i don t understand why one side of the political aisle is not doing. that yeah, it s not a serious party that wants a debate policy and politics. they want to engage in muddying the water and dragging everybody down with them. jason, i want to circle back to a
he makes the argument afghanistan withdrawal, that could be utilized, he makes the argument also about hunter biden. if hunter biden, is under investigation in the fbi. and he s found charge of the crime. what the legal investigative process play out. it s not that hard to say out loud. let the legal and investigative processes play out. i find it mystifying, you have frivolous, impeachment articles drawn up by marjorie taylor greene and lauren bulb are, and the like. we re not getting into policy, why can we get into policy. like dr. greer mentioned, things that are going to affect their constituents. why are we talking about these things that are not substantial. i want to get back to talking about policy. things that impact. i don t understand why one side of the political aisle is not doing. that yeah, it s not a serious party that wants a debate policy and politics. they want to engage in muddying the water and dragging everybody down with them. jason, i want to circle back to a
from british monarchical history bonnie prince charlie, who was not very bonnie and certainly not very successful in his time, having fled scotland after the defeat at culloden, getting him to be their king. i think in the us, actually, there s a fascination with the royalty, with the royal family here that actually transcends generations in part because they re not our royal family and it s not about whether we re having them as our kings and queens or not. 0r having to pay for them! correct. i do find it mystifying, sometimes, the fawning coverage that our networks give to a family that i feel like i need to remind my fellow americans their oppressive yoke was what we threw off nearly 250 years ago and yet, there is this real obsession with them. i think, though, therein also lies the answer for why there is this fascination, and that s because we are still relatively a young country compared to european nations. many of our institutions obviously pale on the timeline in comparison
yeah, there it is. no one makes it except him, which makes it mystifying what happened in the second half. we heard mike florio talk last hour. the bengals sank eight guys in coverage making it difficult to throw the ball down the field, so it is part of it. but it doesn t explain the bad decisions mahomes made, not just the utter brain lock at the end of the first half where they lost a point because he threw the ball inbounds, but he took a couple of sacks late in the game when he could have thrown it away. frankly, the onto worse quarterback play was the play in the last where jimmy garoppolo was in the midst of getting sacked and threw it up for grabs backhanded which led to the rams interception to seal that game. i suspect it will be the last he throws for the 49ers. it will be fun. two years in a row, it is going