Which could come from the United States is not freely available for same way that ours is. What are the options for dealing with that . What are options dealing with that . Potential options for dealing with that are looking at data points, we do not have a position on this particular issue, in my personal capacity, i dont know that we can or would want to completely subscribe to the chinese model of locking this down, looking at data that is accessible, and a faster option. If we can build a bigger database to rival the chinese system does it create a situation where their trove of data . It would be accessible to those participating . It could be different elements of different natives attributed or accessible to certain researchers, and cybersecure so you can understand the integrity of the data sets, thats critically important. It is not generally available. We dont have a position on this, theres different ways one could go about this. As you say, when we talk about research data,
[national anthem] [national anthem] hey, i heard you were a wild one, ooh will:ing good morning and welcome to las vegas, nevada, home of allegiant stadium and home of super bowl lviii where i am coming to you live this morning as part of fox & friends coverage of super bowl sunday. i m in las vegas, rachel and joey are back in new york. much warmer. we have reached a point in super bowl history [laughter] where the super bowl number is higher hand the degrees temperature of the host city, while at least i m broadcasting fox & friends. [laughter] joey: good morning, will. rachel: what is the temperature there? because with you know how cold the studio is. will: rachel, i don t think i can to this with you this morning. [laughter] it is in the 30s, so don t act like your 68-degree studio is roughing it. did you get your café mow a ca? rachel: not yet. i m waiting for it. by the way, will, what was the party like last night? you kind of look a little bit
the ingraham angle from new york city tonight. breaking news tonight, a major win for donald trump. the supreme court smacking down special counsel jack smith and declining to issue an expedited ruling on whether or not the former president has immunity in his 2020 election interference case. fox news senior congressional correspondent chad pier gram iss here with all the details. chad? good evening. this is a blow to special counsel jack smith. he asked the supreme court to accelerate whether the former president was immune from prosecution for allegedly interfering with the 2020 presidential election. the court denied smith s request. this slows down smith s prosecution of mr. trump. it could mean there is no clarity on smith s probe until well into 2024. the federal trial was scheduled to start march 4th. this could mean the trial comes amid the political conventions. or, down the homestretch of the presidential election. team trump may want to drag this out. here s wh
regularly. sean: really? if you come to new york, do one audience show weeks of people can, you know, say hi and shake your hand and they don t give me a standing o. you got a standing l. laura: will get the same people in your event over in my event. appreciate it be all right, hannity. sean: that ll be fun. laura: exactly! thank you, hannity p thank you so much but i am laura ingraham pair this is the ingraham angle. thank you for sending time with us tonight. the biden protection racket. that s the focus of tonight s angle. they couldn t even trust be a 13 to announce he s running for reelection live on camera. why is that? [applause] laura: that never gets old. i don t know why. that s just adorable. who said you need a pandemic as an excuse to hide a president lcandidate? all biden needs a willing press corps and they were able to help shield him like they did in 2020. he is the perfect hologram candidate, running the perfect virtual campaign. it s devoid of
a king by wiping out half a trillion dollars of debt and make you, the taxpayer, pay for it. but not so fast. a coalition of six g.o.p.-led states are fighting back, and now the top court will decide if joe overstepped his authority. chuck schumer and the squad bashing the conservative justices and demanding they won t side with biden. 90% of the relief going 2 out of school borrowers will go to those earning less than $75,000 a year. this isn t a handout to the wealthy. callous and spiteful republican officials, disconnected from the hardship of every day folks, who are burdened by this debt. they want this radicalized, extremist supreme court to take away the hope that the president of the united states has given those of us who have been rallying for this call. this unhinged supreme court can make these decisions but we are not going anywhere. the president of the united states that i hope can hear me does have the legal authority to cancel debt. jeanine: but it is