understand its value, we are not vigilant about protecting it. that is why twitter and the silicon valley mob has been able to take over public discourse in the way that it has. tucker: i think you are absolutely right, and i think a lot of people don t understand what it looks like if this continues even a little bit further. we are going to regret it. jason whitlock, i appreciate your coming on. thank you. thank you. tucker: so a brand-new report reveals just how extensive big tech s efforts to protect the democratic party has been. hundreds of posts censored simply for being critical of the president of the united states. speaking truth to power no longer allowed if the power is joe biden. that is straight ahead.
so show you can trust that s not going t sneak in propaganda. you re not paying attention to our conversation. we stream to our morning steve rinella tucker carlson states now out at six seven am six p.m. central well big tech coordinated to sensor several h high profile stories about biden over the last year. but l most censorship online is hidden. you never hear about it. you don t t knowhidden and what s happening tonight . the media research center hast, new reporting on the scope of big tech s efforts to keepor your opinions hidden. they found more than six hundred and forty examples content, otherded speech restrictions placed on those who criticize joe biden on social mediaci over the past two years. tim geithner is the vice president and media research center. he joins us tonight to tell us what he found. dan , thanks for coming on . fid well, what we found o is obviously one of the big categories was the hunter biden story. you re talking about major players being censored. pr
a professor of medicine and public health. he s precisely the type of person that americans should be hearing hearing fromming from. he s precisely the type of person to be engaging in a scientific debate, and that s what people need to hear. that s the only reason why his voice is able to be heard now, which is stunning, is because there was an equally powerful platform if, which is fox news, that said, hey, we re going to call you out on this. we re going to call you to account for this naked censorship of scientific debate. that s not okay. and so we need to stand up for all of the diverse, small independent voices that don t have a platform like fox news and say that this will not be tolerated. steve: that s exactly right. well put. thank you, kristin. well, look, if you want to hear more conversations like that with jay and more from kristin, make sure you check us out at california rebel base.com. and now let s take a step back and look at the big picture when it comes to big t
democratize information. and, to be fair, in many ways they still do, helping people express themselves, connect with others, helping entrepreneurs find customers and artists to find an audience. but there s a dark side, and it seems to be getting darker. we talk about the how big tech s control over our society s orwellian. 1984 and big brother. there s another george orwell book that s just as relevant, animal farm, where the revolutionaries turn into the very thing they fought against. that s what we re seeing now, the idealists of silicon valley are also the most menacing authoritarians of our age because they threaten the foundation of a free society, free expression. when you re doing the bidding of the government and taking down content they don t find convenient, how is that any different from running pravda in the soviet union or xi jinping s china daily? when you re censoring just one
democratize information. and, to be fair, in many ways they still do, helping people express themselves, connect with others, helping entrepreneurs find customers and artists to find an audience. but there s a dark side, and it seems to be getting darker. we talk about the how big tech s control over our society s orwellian. 1984 and big brother. there s another george orwell book that s just as relevant, animal farm, where the revolutionaries turn into the very thing they fought against. that s what we re seeing now, the idealists of silicon valley are also the most menacing authoritarians of our age because they threaten the foundation of a free society, free expression. when you re doing the bidding of the government and taking down content they don t find convenient, how is that any different from running pravda in the soviet union or xi jinping s china daily? when you re censoring just one