and the naacp speech, is there an element to this white house that is too reactive on every side so that, you know, the public polls say you should bash bankers more and so he starts bashing bankers. you know, he won t be photographed there are a couple of cases i know of where he literally would not be photographed with somebody from the financial industry. even people who had nothing to do with i won t be photographed with anyone from the financial understand. then you have this business of worrying about, you know, that glenn beck might do a show on something, so you fire somebody. shouldn t they be kind of doing what they think is right for the country, or is that quaintly old-fashioned? no, i think that s very up to date and cutting edge, actually. it seems to me that the big the big factor in that mess was that the naacp labeled her a racist. and of course then what s the administration isn t that good enough for anybody, if the
photographed with somebody from the financial industry. even people who had nothing to do with i won t be photographed with anyone from the financial industry. then you have this business of worrying about, you know, that glenn beck might do a show on something, so you fire somebody. shouldn t they be kind of doing what they think is right for the country, or is that quaintly old-fashioned? no, i think that s very up to date and cutting edge, actually. it seems to me that the big the big factor in that mess was that the naacp labeled her a racist. and of course then what s the administration isn t that good enough for anybody, if the naacp says it? i don t think this was a case of i just don t think it proves what everybody seems to be saying it proves. you don t think david axelrod is running the country, in other words? i don t think anybody s running the country. and i think that s probably the
lashkar-e-taiba. this was the groups behind the attacks in mumbai. the organization has finally been banned but it has regrouped by every analysis and it still continues to flourish within pakistan. when are you going to take action against them? the individuals who were responsible for the mumbai attack are all now under arrest. and we have requested our indian neighbors to provide us with evidence in the sense of allowing indian officials who have knowledge of this matter, to travel to pakistan and give evidence in our court. and we will be able to complete the prosecution process and convict these people. this is, frankly, if it happens, a big change in pakistani policy. well, look, pakistani policy changed very clearly, even after 9/11. it started changing. i think the changes are in much faster gear now. our military leadership, our intelligence leadership, and our civilian leadership are all on the same page. i understand the cynicism of people.
happens, a big change in pakistani policy. well, look, pakistani policy changed very clearly, even after 9/11. it started changing. i think the changes are in much faster gear now. our military leadership, our intelligence leadership, and our civilian leadership are all on the same page. i understand the cynicism of people. pakistan s history has given a lot of people reason for cynicism about democracy, about our relations with our neighbors, about relations with the united states. and then there is cynicism in pakistan, will the united states walk away from us again, will something go wrong with afghanistan again. so this cynicism, but in this environment of cynicism i any we need to be very clear about one thing. pakistan as a nation can have a good future only if we resolve our problems in our neighborhood, our neighbors are reasonable about it, the united states support this process of transformation, and pakistan emerges as a democracy. pakistan wants to play well with the worl