congressmen, they are ready to blow up this entire deal despite being just days from default. this deal fails, fails completely. and that s why these members and others will be absolutely opposed to the deal and we will do everything in our power to stop it and end it now. tomorrow s bill is a bunch of fake news and fake talking points that will do nothing to reign in out of control federal spending. in good conscious should support this. not one republican should vote for this deal. it is a bad deal. not only are republicans becoming deeply divided on this but there are even thefts to oust mccarthy as speaker because of the deal he made with biden. joining me now is texas congressman chip roy and by ronned donald both members of the freedom caucus both against
want biden either. and we also know from no labels history that they deemed trump a problem solver in 20 2016. featured him along with four other republicans and one democratic candidate. in an event in new hampshire. and then during the biden administration, have opposed many of biden s signature policies like build back better. so i think that there is some warranted skepticism of who is behind this and who is funding this. and what really are their aims. because there is not a lot of clarity as to when the situation, when the decision will be made. and how the decision will be made to advance and actual candidate. to advance candidates and put them on the ballot line. they are currently spending a lot of money trying to get on. the ballot in many states. mark, what you sort of just laid, out the idea behind it
the leading candidates according to real politics, mike huckabee was at zero and he won the iowa caucus. 2015 it was walker rubio and huckabee that were the top three candidates at this time in may of 2015, and actually cruz and trump who were first and second winners combined weren t even at 10%. so, you know, the field s not even set yet. iowans as i said, what i m encouraged with they re showing up listening asking tough questions and they want to make sure that they get this right, that we have the best candidate to take out president biden in 20 24. and so, you know, it s way early, lots can happen. so they have a real opportunity to get out there, meet iowaians, i would recommend coming to the state come often travel to all 99 counties i promise you iowans will show up. they are really in tuned to the issues. . kayleigh: that s true. they take our first in the nation caucus very seriously. yes.
while stephanie, the one thing i say about politics, people say well is not going to happen because it s never happened before. and then it happens. we will never elect a black president, we will never elect an actor president or a real estate millionaire from new york. the idea behind this is to simply pave the road for the possibility. if we get to next may and it is a break glass and take case of emergency. emergency would be not to help trump but to be in a situation where trump was up 15 points over biden, who may have had a health crisis or some god forbid that happens, that is what happens when you re 80 years old. so we have to discuss the possibilities. so it is simply laying the tracks. because you cannot decide next june if there is an emergency to do something about them, because you have to get on the ballot in enough states to get a third party going. and this is not a protest vote. they have set specifically that this is not designed to try to help trump, they are dedi
case of emergency. there would be no reason not to disclose who is funding this 70 million dollar effort to create a new ballots line for an unnamed candidate. so, i think that s one of the issues. the other issue is, in some cases this is promoted as a way to stop trump or prevent trump. the marketing materials also talk about how voters don t want biden either. and we also know from no labels history that they deemed trump a problem solver in 20 2016. featured him along with four other republicans and one democratic candidate. in an event in new hampshire. and then during the biden administration, have opposed many of biden s signature policies like build back better. so i think that there is some warranted skepticism of who is behind this and who is funding this. and what really are their aims.