55% rate in 2011. that s unacceptable in my view. the good news frankly is presumably it is unacceptable to most republicans. what does that do? that undercuts their major strategy for the last eight months which is to delay and to obstruct. they need to have this passed because their policy will result in an objective they now say they don t want. so that i am very hopeful we give to families the certainty of a rate. my own view would be that when the house passed 3.5 and 45% it was a good compromise and should be adopted. it reflected inflationry increases in values of estates. it gave to to i don t know the exact percentage, but over 98.5% of the states exemption from the paying estate tax. in interest of time. congressman? this is the last question. thank you. thank you majority leader hoyer for your comments, i appreciate it. i m monica mire. thank you with your help with the bill this week. that was a victory. eo encouraged our republicans to reflect and
we will be undertaking a review of this which will be attending implementation. we will be looking at to be centers of excellence for health. the stock has been involved in this issue. we will be looking at those from the standpoint of implementation. one thing i would like to bring to the attention of the committee is that the colonel is a good example of how this works. . . i want to make sure we have a system that looks closely at the ability to serve and think outside the box and look to people like karl gattison and others. once you can t stay on active-duty, i do believe we could do a lot better than just the two agency the agencies involved had a department of defense to take care of soldiers. and veteran affairs is to take care of those who have served. and the interim period of time between medical discharge and evaluation and rehabilitation is is always going to be complex. but this idea of standard definitions that mental health services and rehabilitative
we will be undertaking a review of this which will be attending implementation. we will be looking at to be centers of excellence for health. the stock has been involved in this issue. we will be looking at those from the standpoint of implementation. one thing i would like to bring to the attention of the committee is that the colonel is a good example of how this works. . . i want to make sure we have a system that looks closely at the ability to serve and think outside the box and look to people like karl gattison and others. once you can t stay on active-duty, i do believe we could do a lot better than just the two agency the agencies involved had a department of defense to take care of soldiers. and veteran affairs is to take care of those who have served. and the interim period of time between medical discharge and evaluation and rehabilitation is is always going to be complex. but this idea of standard definitions that mental health services and rehabilitative