Picking for the opposition. This crisis is the inevitable result of 13 years crisis is the inevitable result of 13 years of crisis is the inevitable result of 13 years of cutting corners, botch jobs, 13 years of cutting corners, botch jobs, Sticking Plaster politics. And alleuedl , jobs, Sticking Plaster politics. And allegedly. A jobs, Sticking Plaster politics. fific allegedly, a westminster staffer arrested for spying for china. So we will ask this morning, while the uk bakes, how much more can go wrong when the Prime Minister is in the indian son . The man responsible forjailsjoins us. Can the Justice Secretary tell us how on earth Daniel Khalife escaped . The indian sun. Jonathan reynolds, whod be labours captain of industry, is live in the studio too. Jonathan reynolds, whod be labours captain of industry, is live in the studio too. And an exclusive interview from across the atlantic with this powerful duo the uk and the us most senior military men, admiral tony radakin and gene
What are the clear bright lines whether or not youll continue on the registry and have to be extraordinarily careful how to be removed it is two substantive so if so it is about your location and in good stans with the city. Yeah. And tammy. It is an open are house. Yeah. So i want to brought to your attention as i think weve mentioned this before that weve combined some of the instructions in the completion of the application so section one is just to give the basic details of the business overflow room location, section 3 again you know the businesses have to be current on their financial obligations, their you can employment obligations and that they understand the information is subject to the public section number 4 the written narrative and again you know we do have businesses that have changed hands over time and so one of the things we are discovering and or they change locates what happens is that new Business Owner or the new location maybe less than 20 years so that we cant
This was moved and seconded one june june 14, 2016 can i have a approval from the rules committee . These were all required as part of the local plan we did not have them at all prior to this and. I would like to invite liz blanco to please come forward and answer any questions that you may have. Are there any questions . Actually of a proposed amendment to one of the policies. 6164. 4 the adoption of the right for evaluation. I looked it up in the faq it is on our website and i do think it is important to have in our board policies and it is a legal right of our parentsand what i would propose is that in the final paragraph of our policy that after the words concerning their child i would add the phrase and the right to request an independent educational evaluation at district expense if the Parent Guardian disagrees with the districts evaluation. Is there a second . Second. Pres. Haney, can we ask the council to give us advice on that . Commissioner norton, the change that you reques
510 folsom street also known as transbay block 9 not to exceed 95,000,000] sponsor kim resolution declaring the intent of the city and county of San Francisco city to reimburse certain expenditures from proceeds of future bonded indebtedness; authorizing the director of the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development director to submit an application and related documents to the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee cdlac to permit the issuance of tax exempt Residential Rental housing bonds in an aggregate Principal Amount not to exceed 95,000,000 to finance costs of the construction of 311 rental Housing Units to be located on the first 21 floors of a 42story mixed use building to be constructed at 510 folsom street sdp [multifamily housing Revenue Bonds 185515th street not to exceed 48,715,000] sponsors mayor; wiener resolution declaring the intent of the city and county of San Francisco the city to reimburse certain expenditures from proceeds of future bonded indebtednes
Process forren dangered rare and species and already by existing development and the subdivision will be consistent with the urban Development Project in the city. The fifth criterion is whether the subdivision will cause Serious Health problems, again t subdivision will make for low density and housing and will not create a Serious Public Health problem. The fact that the project will lead to access to more public open space. The project sponsor will be at their own cost constructing a public staircase and landscaping along the street next to the project site so it will lead to more access. The sixth criterion whether it will conflict with the public easement on the property. The property will result in Greater Public access to carver street through the construction of that staircase. So in short, the appellants provide no basis under the state map act and the code. What we have here is an appellant who is very clearly opposed to the project using the map appeal as a new venue to chal