i m fareed zakaria. today we devote the program to that sobering anniversary. one year since russia s full-scale invasion of ukraine. i ll bring you my interview with the national security adviser jake sullivan and u.s. aid administrator samantha power about where the war and america s assistance go from here. also, who should foot the bill for the hundreds of billions of dollars in damage to ukraine? former treasury secretary larry summers said the answer is easy. listen to him explain his plan. then, why putin s war on ukraine might not be proceeding as he hoped. the russian president may be getting exactly what he always wanted back home in russia. the new york times valerie hopkins will explain. but first, here is my take. one year into russia s naked aggression against ukraine it is become clear that neither side is strong enough to win the war, nor weak enough to sue for peace. the conflict has settled into a stalemate. after making impressive gains, ukraine s arm
zelenskyy had. samantha power, let me ask you a question that is really in your belly wick. and it is something that a lot of people thinks about, a lot of republicans have been clamoring about, before the war ukraine was regarded as, if you look at various indices, a very corrupt country. and all of those kind eof measures, how you could be sure that the massive amounts of aid that the united states and europe is sending into ukraine are getting to the people they need to get to, that there isn t corruption, graft, siphoning off, what kind of assurances could you give? well one thing, just stepping back and recalling a year ago, putin s speech where he described his motivation for invading ukraine at the heart of it was his panic over the
assistant secretary for iraq and iran. good to have you on. thanks so much. frankly it matters to me more in the moment. do you have any information that we can share with the audience about the chance that those americans that are held in north korea are going to come home with mike pompeo? i don t, i m sorry. is that because there is no development or you re just being sensitive to the situation? i m the iran official. i can t speak to the north korea developments. i wanted to ask because that matters. i get that it s being used as a political device, there s good and bad reason for that. you just wanted to ask. thank you for going on the record about it. back to what your belly wick is. why are my kids and americans and their children more safe because of what the president just did? well, i think reimposing the sanctions that were lifted under the jcpoa allows us to better counter the totality of iran s maligned behavior in the region. not just get to a place where we
they ignored him. i mean what more need there be to sustain the kind of charge that has been brought against goodson and the other officers? i really don t understand the hesitation the equivocation here. he did not come to that scene, freddie gray with vertebrae fractures, he would not be running and moving the way he was. he was injured by the cops. they want to say, gee, maybe it didn t all happen in the van. let it say it could have happened him in the van and for what from looking at the police. fine. jump from the firing pan into the fire. it is in their hands, in their belly wick. let them be the fuss. the medical examiner should be commended for calling this what
greg: it already happened. have you state agents and state officer who is actually are enforcing law, immigration laws. so it s already happening. it s okay, the federal government is okaying that it s okay for state actors to help them enforce federal law but not okay for the states to make their own law in the field of immigration. greg: yes. they didn t make a law, they just reiterated the same law. and the only difference is they want to enforce it. so it s about policy, it is not about law. right. except that the federal the lawsuit is saying that states cannot have immigration laws. that falls only under the belly wick of the federal government. greg: here s the interesting thing, i have run out of information on this. all right. weil move on. greg: yes. i was right up against the wall. as always, legal asks me to point out that i am not a lawyer. but i am jewish, so we can assume that i could be a lawyer fiwanted to or a doctor. yeah. absolutely.