about the tape doesn t the defense bring on its own witness? then you have the battle of the expert. that normal. that usually turns into a personality test. the defense is saying, tell them what the tape says, what the words are, and let them determine what they ultimately find they hear on the tape. because you know what? nine jurors may hear one thing, three jurors may hear something else and if they re not sure the tie goes to the defense team. thing aboutç hiding witnesses youngs have to meet a high burden to say the general public won t know who the witnesses are. shepard: in this case it s only six jurors and four alternates. welcome to florida. but i hear you. it doesn t seem out of the ordinary. i ve covered a lot of trials. doesn t seem out of the ordinary for a piece of evidence like this to be admitted for the defense and the prosecution to offer theirç take on this piece of evidence, and that for the
trayvon martin was shot and killed, could be a key piece of evidence. he had a closed fracture of his nose, two black eyes, two cuts to the back of his head in a minor back injury. i want to go to martin savidge covering the story for us. with all these new details and developments does it help zimmerman s argument he was in fact standing his ground they killed trayvon martin in self-defense? reporter: it depends on who you talk to. here s the way it breaks down. this information coming from the prosecution, the special prosecutor angela corey, they had to provide the basics of their investigation over to the defense so that s why we re starting to see this information come out this week. two reports caught her eye, the autopsy report on trayvon martin and that s the one you re referring to that says bruising on the hands of trayvon martin that would seem to support the defense s claim that george zimmerman says that trayvon martin came up to him, punched him in the nose, k
charged her with murder, perhaps that s where she concocted the story. the defense says no story is concocted. it is the truth, and they will convince the jury that have. there was also expert testimony there as well today concerning the possibility of evidence of decomposition in the back of the car. can you tell us a little bit about that. they keep coming back to this. they keep coming back to this, and the defense is focused on this now because there were high levels of chloroform, according to the prosecution witnesses in the trunk of the car, and the suggestion is that chloroform is connected to her murder because she went on the computer searching for chloroform, and, of course, the defense is trying to suggest that there is no evidence of chloroform there at all. it s the battle of the expert witnesses and the jury is going to have a tough time deciding which expert they want to believe because two experts in the field saying contrary things. it s day 25 of the trial toda