you won the week. that s tonight s read out, all in with chris hayes starts now. all tonight on all in. a jury still witnessed a what rudy giuliani did to me and my daughter, and held him accountable, and for that, i m thankful. breaking news across all the networks. oh my goodness, all the networks. wow. tonight, the crushing verdict against donald trump s lead election denier. she, she. the attorney for them ruby freeman and shaye moss will join me. rudy was not the only one to week a apologies from two top codefendants could be a dark side of things to come. plus, new reporting on donald trump and the missing binder of classified intelligence on russia. and jodi kantor of the new york times on her explosive new reporting on how the supreme court maneuvered to end federal abortion rights all in starts right now. good evening from new york, i m chris hayes. rudy giuliani has been ordered by a jury to pay to georgia election workers 100 and $48 million in
president a legacy of several decades of his take on the court. how do you think it could shift the court if at all? that is the big point. it is already a very young court. justice barrett s and 50. she turned 50 on friday. so this will change. i think there s a sense in which breyer seems like from the past. and that will be the big change. to john s point, i totally agree. i think a few people like holly will blow hot air but if the republicans are smart, and i think they will be, this isn t something they want to fight only to lose. graham i think signaled today that they are going to let it go through and maybe try to use talking points about activists, democrats, or whatever. but they would be ill-advised, i think, to make a big long fight. biden this gives him a great talking point and focus. i think republicans will want what is good for the dems will be good for the republicans here. they want to make fairly quick
releasing his phone and providing a sample explaining he was first notified approximately an hour prior to his commencement. had he been given more advance notice, he hopes and prays for miss barrett s return. police posted about the news conference the night before, and he knew there would be a news conference but wasn t given details, kelsey is the company received a text from kelsey s phone saying she would be out for the week, the same day, received a text, content unknown. kelsey s phone came from 7 miles away in southern idaho stating we extend support to the family of miss barrett and hope for her immediate safe return. police have not named any suspects.
jaw fractures and was in the hospital for several days, according to the federal xlanlt. barrett s attorney claim he is bipolar but was off his medicine the night of the attack. later he went to this bar and showed off to bystanders. one of them an offduty police officer. knockouts have been going on since 1992 because string of cases over the last year has garnered more national attention with video that has gone viral from states like illinois to washington to new york. the purpose of the so-called game is to knock unsuspecting pedestrians out cold with a single punch. this caused them to reexamine state versus federal hate crimes. state law enhances hate crimes. in other words, your sentence send answered if it is proved that you committed a hate crime. however that is defined in a particular state. but under federal law, hate crimes are a separate crime. which again raises some questions about the constitutionality, with the equal protection clause. reporter: barrett s attorney
texas. barrett s attorney claims he was bipolar but was off his meds the night of the attack. later he went to this bar and showed off the video to bystander, one of them an off-duty police officer. knockout incidents have dated as far back as 1992, but video that has gone viral. from states like illinois to washington to new york. the purpose of the so-called game is to knock unsuspecting pedestrians out cold with a single punch. the barrett case has prompted lawmakers to re-examine state versus federal hate crimes. state law just enhances hate crimes. in other words, your sentence is enhanced if it is proved that you committed a hate crime. however that s defined in a particular state. but under federal law hate crimes are a separate crime, which again raises some questions about the constitutionality of the equal protection clause. reporter: barrett s attorney