We must ask how good is the model. There is a story about a man from minneapolis who walked into a store, target, and asked to see the manager. His daughter was being bombarded with pregnancy related coupons from target. They asked are you trying to encourage her to get pregnant, he asked . The store manager apologized profusely. He called the father several days later to apologize again. Only this time come the man was less irate. This has turned be apologetic. He said it turns out there has been sacked activities in my house i havent been completely aware of. Father said she is due in august. Statistician had figured out that his daughter was pregnant for heeded. This is not even the creepiest part. [laughter] that is their business, it is also not their business. I can feel more than a little interested. Some companies mask a much they know. For example, if you are a pregnant woman in your second trimester, you may get coupons in the mail for cribs and diapers. Along with a coupon f
Instance are not targeted. I dont know if american libraries the question i was asked to ask is wont those folks go to commercial why 5 vendors and it is a question of efficacy. Will be truly effective if there are options to go to other commercial wifi providers like mcdonalds or starbucks or other places not associated with the program . I guess i would say that goes back to the assumption of the program which is most people are not working hard to gain the system or to engage in large scale Copyright Infringement and i would imagine someone who will take the time to stop using their home network and go to starbucks or mcdonalds and download movies in those categories. And we are working under the assumption based on the research that we have done over the last, and it could be an enormous problem. And a misunderstanding with copyright is and what the limits are, how to find what people want in a legal way. I dont think we will see a spate of people in their homes and camping at star