Its very important that we work with the applicant. For tonight purposes is to understand to memorialize the conditions. I was glad to hear that a youth permit would be needed for a bar to be established. But i would like to point out that the owner, the applicant could agree now not to put any bars in the future and that would be a sign of good faith that they could agree to. We did have a problem with the bar in the same building with the marsh in berkeley and it caused quite a few problems. Couple of other comments, i support the approval on the construction. I think its very important for the conditions of approval about prospective owners and tenants actually signing something acknowledging that they have a limited or no right to object to future uses. Finally i would like to point out that its possible to agree that parking not be requested by future residents. Thank you. Hi. Im a 30year resident of the neighborhood and attended a huge variety of marsh performances. My main point
Dog no one it looking at that it fits in so well were looking at the frame and glass facade. So i dont think we should be swayed by conversation of the one sixth of the site is the piece that matters and its been brought out by a number of the speakers. Im concerned about the stockton side theres no change there and the question about the variance thats required. Ive sought variances on issues and theres been hardships that are there and obviously designing a building theres no hardship there thats not our charge so im not sure how it gets resolved. I dont have a major concern but its again only one building i could find in the desire district that doesnt have any blank walls thats on the macys building on farrell that has blank walls but thats not a shining i didnt example of walls in our district. The materials you know the bar building is great. I think to say you cant have cast stone that looks like indiana wall stone, of course, you can use stone that looks like stone thats approp
With that, ill let sue take over and if you have any questions, ill be happy to answer them so to kind of wrap up up the schedule for this element. Were proposing to close the commentary weve extended that and to include the comments we are going to have a couple of for hearings on the park commissions and i think thats on the 27th. So let me know if you have any questions or comments. Right off the timing of this being adapted and the preservation element i mean, theres no way the prejudice element is going to be ready how does that get into this. That is one of the general plan elements there will be 8 preservation elements but there will be a much more thorough and Historic Preservation. Whats our ideal timeline getting it done and approved. Great question tim fry Department Staff in the 2014 2015 staff well start engaging the public and the process conservatively it will take a couple of years. Along with the recreation and upper Design Elements there are friendly policies that are
Schedule for this element. Were proposing to close the commentary weve extended that and to include the comments we are going to have a couple of for hearings on the park commissions and i think thats on the 27th. So let me know if you have any questions or comments. Right off the timing of this being adapted and the preservation element i mean, theres no way the prejudice element is going to be ready how does that get into this. That is one of the general plan elements there will be 8 preservation elements but there will be a much more thorough and Historic Preservation. Whats our ideal timeline getting it done and approved. Great question tim fry Department Staff in the 2014 2015 staff well start engaging the public and the process conservatively it will take a couple of years. Along with the recreation and upper Design Elements there are friendly policies that are in all the elements so there isnt anything to preclude us to adding anything to what were drafted and showing you today.
That would, you know, makeorbreak the building i think the stepping of the mask down in essence the whole bar issue is the tail wagging the dog no one it looking at that it fits in so well were looking at the frame and glass facade. So i dont think we should be swayed by conversation of the one sixth of the site is the piece that matters and its been brought out by a number of the speakers. Im concerned about the stockton side theres no change there and the question about the variance thats required. Ive sought variances on issues and theres been hardships that are there and obviously designing a building theres no hardship there thats not our charge so im not sure how it gets resolved. I dont have a major concern but its again only one building i could find in the desire district that doesnt have any blank walls thats on the macys building on farrell that has blank walls but thats not a shining i didnt example of walls in our district. The materials you know the bar building is great.