Because i think youve provided objective fact based views on what the dangers are and the risks, and potentially even human extinction, an existential threat which i mentioned by many more than just the three of you, experts who know firsthand the potential for harm. But these fears need to be addressed. I think they can be addressed through many of the concessions that you are making to us and others as well. Ive come to the conclusion that we need some kind of regulatory, not just a reactive body. Not just a passive rules to the road maker, edicts on what guardrails should be. But actually investing proactively in research so that we develop countermeasures against the kinds of autonomous apple controlled scenarios that are a potential danger. Artificial intelligence device is in effect programed to resist any turning off. A decision by a. I. To begin Nuclear Reaction to a nonexistent attack. The white house certainly has recognized the urgency with a historic meeting of the seven Ma
In federal farm offering this is about three hours. Good morning. The subcommittee on commodities, Risk Management and trade will come to order. Welcome to all of our witnesses. Senator hyde smith thank you to you and your staff working together with us to organize this hearing today. Chair stabenow and i believe Ranking Member boozman will be with us shortly but it would to thank them for joining us many thanks to the full Committee Staff for all of your help and support with this hearing. Thank you to everyone for attending. This morning is going to be a twopart hearing. Today was on the farm bill, the products title. On thursday will take on title v. The credit title in title 11 the Crop Insurance title. February the full committee the full Senate Committee heard from usda officials their family views of Risk Management and credit. Today we have the opportunity to hear directly from farmers, producers, stakeholder groups that work with farm Safety Net Programs every day. Hearing fro
Because i think youve provided objective fact based views on what the dangers are and the risks, and potentially even human extinction, an existential threat which i mentioned by many more than just the three of you, experts who know firsthand the potential for harm. But these fears need to be addressed. I think they can be addressed through many of the concessions that you are making to us and others as well. Ive come to the conclusion that we need some kind of regulatory, not just a reactive body. Not just a passive rules to the road maker, edicts on what guardrails should be. But actually investing proactively in research so that we develop countermeasures against the kinds of autonomous apple controlled scenarios that are a potential danger. Artificial intelligence device is in effect programed to resist any turning off. A decision by a. I. To begin Nuclear Reaction to a nonexistent attack. The white house certainly has recognized the urgency with a historic meeting of the seven Ma
Okay. We are back. Next, we are going to go to the gentleman from tennessee, mr. Rose, for five minutes. Thank you to director chopra for being here today. Director chopra, last month, the New York Times ran an article with the headline calling you, quote, wall streets most hated regulator. And that bankers believe that you are a regulator gone rogue. Do you agree with the characterization that you are wall streets most hated regulator and a regulator gone rogue . Certainly not, but you know, you will have to ask them. We try to make sure that all of our work is with the Public Interest in mind, including with Financial Institutions. I want to say this to you. I feel this strongly about all of our federal regulators. In my view, your first responsibility is to help those who you regulate comply with the regulations. That your entire approach to that regulated community that you deal with should be to empower, enable, inform, educate, facilitate their compliance with the regulations tha
And then welcome. Thank you for joining us today for the july installment of the and lecture series on the topic of Herbert Hoover versus the Great Depression. My is noah gould and i manage alumni and student programs here at the acton institute. I would like to thank our generous donors as well as all who make events like these possible. The format of this event will be a 30 minute lecture followed by a q a this event is being recorded and streamed live, so please wait for the microphone to be passed you for your question. It is my privilege today to introduce dr. George nash. Dr. Nash was born in holyoke massachusetts. He received his ph. D. In history from harvard university. Dr. Nash is the author, the conservative intellectual movement in america since 1945, which is considered foundational work in its field. Dr. Nash is an authority on the life of president Herbert Hoover. Between 1975 and 1995, he lived in iowa near the Herbert Hoover president ial library, where he prepared thr