Proceedings. We will see if he stops to speak to reporters as he makes his way back into the courtroom. Usually is not the case, its usually on his way out at this time of day but we will be watching for that hello and welcome everyone i am sandra smith the new york as we head into our number to. John a lot ahead in the next 60 minutes on john roberts in washington this America Reports perry when court resumes they will meet with the prosecution and defense on what should be included in the Jury Instructions before liberation is. Its a critical step of the trial as the instructions will be the last thing the jury hears before deliberating for a verdict. A threadbare inventive prosecution, but the judge can kind of put his finger on the skill or not in these instructions. It will be very interesting the instructions but of course it all goes back to Jury Selection too, who are these people and what of their biases . John we have an allstar lineup of guests to take us through the latest
argument. the argument you re making is the following, that subsequent policy decisions are things that depressed the turnout in 2010. i disagree. completely a structural issue that has to do with getting these margin no voters who come out and are sort of not as attuned to the political process, getting them to come out as habitual voters as a matter of course. not because, oh, you didn t have a public option. oh, no, no, no. it s not because of that. it s because the people who bring out those voters are the activists who are trying to that s a more nuances that is a more nuanced theory. they re trying to protect their rear guard. the unions right now should not be worried that the president is going to push to cut social security. what they should be doing is pushing right now for comprehensive immigration reform. they should be going out there and convincing candidates to run on increasing the minimum wage. these are things that if you bring out that youth vote. but i
this sort of bank shot theory about how demoralization of activists has a cascade effect in terms of absolutely. as sam just said, we need to go out there and tell people, it s our responsibility to turn out the vote. and we need to go out there on off year elections for comprehensive immigration reform, for, you know, raising the minimum wage. here s a perfect example. comprehensive immigration reform is the perfect example, okay? here s what s going to happen. and i ve seen this from activists on the immigration front, who i respect enormously. who have been so kickass and amazing. but i see them saying they were frustrated, we ve had broken promises, directed at the president. the answer to comprehensive immigration reform not getting through, if that s what you want, is to vote out republican members of the house. it is that simple. there is no electoral calculation to be made here other than that. and yet, sometimes, delay and obstruction ends up serving to demoralize people
argument. the argument you re making is the following, that subsequent policy decisions are things that depressed the turnout in 2010. i disagree. completely a structural issue that has to do with getting these margin no voters who come out and are sort of not as attuned to the political process, getting them to come out as habitual voters as a matter of course. not because, oh, you didn t have a public option. oh, no, no, no. it s not because of that. it s because the people who bring out those voters are the activists who are trying to that s a more nuances that is a more nuanced theory. they re trying to protect their rear guard. the unions right now should not be worried that the president is going to push to cut social security. what they should be doing is pushing right now for comprehensive immigration reform. they should be going out there and convincing candidates to run on increasing the minimum wage. these are things that if you bring out that youth vote. but i