Last week we discussed the state ballot measure that would legalize the recreational use of marijuana in Nevada. We have mixed views on that issue, but there are three other important state ballot questions we oppose. Question 1 would require background checks for almost all gun sales or transfers.
2014 Nevada ballot issues will be discussed at the monthly Carson City Women’s Democratic Club meeting which will be held this Saturday, Aug. 9 at 502 E. John St. in Carson City. The meeting starts at 9:30 a.m. with a continental breakfast and speakers begin at 10 a.m. The public is encouraged to attend.
jordan also part of thaconsortium of the 21% they now bought in that f-1 team. also owning a portion of that. he has mint mobile, telecom agency, advertising, media, even online dating believe it or not. so fingers in many pies for ryan reynolds. i d say a renaissance man, mr. reynolds. still ahead here, ohio lawmakers want to change how amendments are made to that state s constitution. we ll have a look at the ballot questions voters will soon face in a special election and its potential wide ranging impact. we ll be right back with that important story. back with that important story.
let s look at how that plays out, wendy. you ve seen it in north carolina and south carolina and texas and places like that where these restrictions are in place and people like you have fought them for a long time. what does fighting it at the state level look like other than in the statewide ballot questions that are up or down? as michelle says, when you ask an up or down question, you get do not add restrictions to my life. that s not how they generally work. michelle made the point well a few moments ago about the fact we are being ruled by a minority of the minority. we re living in gerrymandered districts that be have given control a very small percentage to dictate the outcome.
Ballot Question 1, creating a Court of Appeals The problem is that the Nevada Supreme Court is overwhelmed by appeals. But the proposed fix, detailed in Senate Bill 463 (2013), does not address the fact that the Court has no authority to decide which cases it will hear.