platform because to me more knowledge is less knowledge. it s ridiculous. i understand people s fear, but that fear means you should probably look into this. i also heard you laugh at what he said. were you laughing because you were just uncomfortable. people think laughter is agreement. there is many different types of laughter. i laugh when i m nervous. bathing in white privilege is shocking. i laugh when i m baffles. my wife doesn t like when i laugh at things in shock. i hear you, and it is tickling me inside. it doesn t mean i agree with it. did you learn anything from him that was eye opening? really the gender politics was way more surprising to me than the race politics. i was expecting the race politics but he says things like women should be in the home. and you re losing 50% of the
she has no idea whether it s russia, china, or anybody else. i m not quoting myself. i m quoting 17 you have no idea. 17 intelligence do you doubt 17 military and civilian agencies. this one baffles me. hans is in d.c. how is there a dispute whether or not it s russia doing the hacking here? 17 agencies have said it is. stephanie, according to u.s. intelligence officials, that s absolutely correct. these are the official assessment from the united states intelligence agencies. what hillary clinton did there, though, is she took the official assessment and she souped it up a little bit. we didn t hear the quip where she said putin wants to have donald trump be the next president of the united states. what the intelligence officials have done is gone so far as to say there s interfering. they haven t said who the kremlin s choice might be. it was an extra bit of augmentation we heard from hillary clinton and crucially, donald trump did not litigate, did not dispute that p
who are stranded out there on those trains and they are just going through all that debris next to the trains right now, perhaps looking for evidence and really trying to put together exactly what happened out here but for the most part i have not seen any other victims from the air here in skyforce10. matt we know that the ntsb the national transportation safety board is gathering information on this crash. we also know that the federal railroad administration is dispatching a team of investigators to come to the scene, but again going back to that steel beam that you saw that crashed right into that train, we don t want to speculate here but can you understand at all what might have caused that beam to wind up in the side of that train? reporter: at this point it sort of baffles me up here jim, to be honest with you, because you try to look at this entire scene and you try to figure out exactly what happened and it s really almost impossible. of course, as you mentioned, we don t
these people are good, but theyy got what they were given to do their investigation. they did not have access toave everything they wanted to have access to. there is still paper out there and still questions. why they didn t go with an independent, totally independent committee and not six former prosecutors of which he was one baffles me. he answered that a little bi- today in one of the millions of questions he took. he said look, i m tied to almost every new jersey law firm. i have some relationship with all of them.w je these guys, with theirnshi reputation, i went with them and there ism. no one going to be ai to challenge their report if they come forward. c my feeling is, although you didn t ask, unless those two people they fired comes forward and said he told me to do it, i that doesn t happen, this is the beginning of the turn around. karl rove said, you can emerge stronger from this and hethis could maybe this was his check. hey, i got to keep the temper in line. i got
and make a berm. this is study, we have architects. it s architecturely designed so as far as the baffles and the concrete and everything that it has, bullets are not going to leave the structure. so, they ve made these special preparations for this, robert. planes could fly as low as 500 feet near this range. under what circumstance could a bullet realistically damage an airplane? well, i mean, a bullet travelling at high travels at high speed. i mean, if it were to leave the range in whatever fashion and let s face it, it may be a small risk, but if there s any risk at all, it s not worth it. it could penetrate an engine, it could cut a hydraulic line, cut a fuel line and that s always a possibility and it could come through the floor of the plane and hit a passenger or a pilot. there s a reason they don t build firing rangers near schools as well.