Joe duffey to come out and talk about life safety issue there were no one were moving forward decided to maintain our request from the board for a 10 year moratorium on enforcement of the order of abatement due to Financial Hardship that is the Property Owners mother that lives in the basement shes 0 no longer able to live diligently and cant afford to live it sth in 2, 3, 4 this neighborhood we looked at the abatement of the unit while thats available this is a singlefamily home neighborhood the purpose to provide the accomodation for the elderly mother and the intent not to create a new unit to be rented this is the Property Owner home so it is not intending to skier to create a second unit thats why we maintain the request for the moratorium and were here for any questions you may have questions for the commissioners . Okay. Seeing none thank you. Does the department want a rebuttal. Its deservedly in your hands. Thank you. Question for the attorney this is we have to vote on this t
Appropriate time we have two special meetings coming up well discuss that at the next item we approved the castro service in addition to the standardized procedures a memorandum of understanding in order for the license ac puncture activity to be able to see our patient within our clinics and then rergs for the term metrological and in closed session approved the performance Patient Safety report that was a busy time. Any questions that i can answer or anyone want to add anything. No okay. Next item please. Item 12 the committee 1k3wr5u7bd setting that is march 17 at 25 van ness a Planning Session and april 7th the meeting at the Mission Based on the services and issues. So commissioners carotid to our rules we would normally hold the election of officers but at the second meeting of march but, in fact that is our Planning Session so it is our proposal to place that on the agenda but ask if even though commission will postpone that to our subsequent meeting which is in april so both of
Can we have a motion to excuse supervisor cohen . So moved. Second, and youre done. Can we move item 5 to the full board without objection . Yes, so moved. Okay, so moved. Madam clerk, item 6. Item number 6, ordinance amending the municipal elections code, sections 100, 110, 200, 205, 220, 230, 260, 335, 500, and 590, and adding section 810, to incorporate state law provisions governing Community College and board of education candidates; change deadlines for withdrawal of candidacy and candidate qualification statements; change the public Inspection Period for candidate materials; change requirements for petition circulator badges; delete the requirement that a disclaimer appear before board of supervisors arguments in the voter information pamphlet; incorporate state law provisions governing signatures in lieu of filing fees; reinstate candidate filing fee provisions; and make other technical amendments. Mr. Chair, is this the amended proposed amended resolution that was just handed
Thank you. Thank you very much, chair yee. Andrew shen, deputy city attorney. Good afternoon again. At the request of the director of elections, there are a few minor amendments and what i just distributed to the committee, just to highlight them to you, ive actually colored them in yellow. And i can explain this. Really basically one set of changes that causes some further amendments to be made. As you recall, at the last rules Committee Meeting on this legislation, one of the main purpose of these recent changes is to change the nomination period specifically to clarify that it only applies to candidates and the mayor and the board of supervisors. Some of the deadlines were changed in the [speaker not understood] of the committee to be considered. Upon further consideration in preparation for todays hearing, we noticed one of the relevant nomination periods, the e 171 through e 146 after we consult an election calendar, we found out that e 171 date are the 171st day before election d
Period specifically to clarify that it only applies to candidates and the mayor and the board of supervisors. Some of the deadlines were changed in the [speaker not understood] of the committee to be considered. Upon further consideration in preparation for todays hearing, we noticed one of the relevant nomination periods, the e 171 through e 146 after we consult an election calendar, we found out that e 171 date are the 171st day before election day actually fell on a saturday. Obviously we didnt want to create a nomination time period where the first day on the option of the candidate filing on the first day when actually show up to city hall, the department of elections and find out its closed. We wanted to move it a day friday in which the candidate could actually file the required papers. So, we actually wanted to shift the nomination period by simply one day up, the same time frame, 25daytime frame and simply move it up so the first day of the time period would fall on a friday.