Wrote, you wrote as defined in legal dictionary, collusion is largely synonymous with conspiracy as thats set forth in statute 18 usc 371. You said at your may 29th press conference and here today, you choose your words carefully. Are you sitting here today testifying Something Different than what your report states . What im asking is, if you can give me the citation, i can look at the citation and evaluate whether it is. Let me clarify. You stated youd stay within the report. I stated your report back to you and you said collusion and conspiracy were not synonymous terms. That was your answer, no. In that, page 180 of volume one of your report it says as defined in legal dictionaries, collusion is largely synonymous with conspiracy as the crime is set forth in general conspiracy statute. You said you chose your words carefully. Are you contradicting your report right now . Not when i read it. So you would change your answer to yes then . No. If you look at the language im reading you
Collusion is synonymous with conspiracy as that is set forth in the federal conspiracy statute. You said at your may 29th press conference and here today you choose your words carefully. Are you testifying Something Different than what your report states . Well, what im asking is if you can give me the citation i can look at the citation and evaluate whether it is actually let me clarify. You stated you would stay within the report. I stated your report back to you and you said that collusion and conspiracy were not synonymous terms. That was your answer was no. Thats correct. In that page 180 of volume 1 of your report, it says, as defined in legal dictionaries collusion is largely synonymous with conspiracy as a crime is set forth in 18 usc 371. You chose your words carefully are you contradicting your report right now. Not when i read it. You change your answer yes. No. If you look at the language. Im reading your report sir. Its a yes or no answer. Page 180. Volume 1. This is from
Investigation into russian interference in the 2016 election. Next, we show you the first hearing, which was focused on potential obstruction of justice by President Trump. This Judiciary Committee hearing is three and a half hours. [indistinct chatter] [indiscernible] [gavel] gavel. Gavel. [indiscernible] idiot. He should wait for someone to Say Something when the cameras are here. [gavel] rep. Nadler the Judiciary Committee will come to order. Without objects in the chair is authorized to declare recesses of the committee at any time, we anytime. We welcome everyone to the hearing on oversight of the report in the investigation into russia interference in the 2016 president ial election. I will now recognize myself for a brief Opening Statement. Director mueller, thank you for being here. I want to say a few words about our themes today, responsibility, integrity, and accountability. Your career is a model of responsibility. You are a decorated marine officer, awarded a purple heart,
Want to listen to. Apple making it easier to transfer data between phones. The Cupertino Company has a new feature allowing you to transfer almost everything wirelessly. All you need is to connect both phones to a wifi network, select transfer from your iphone option. Those apps are the only thing that dont actually transfer. So android by the way has had a similar feature for years now. New this morning, you can customize your own doughnut. Krispy kreme is opening its first store you can have it your way. Pick your bow nut, glazes, toppings and drizzle flavors and also a doughnut ice cream sandwiches. The new store opened yesterday in concord, north carolina. Not concord, bay area, and check out the line of people that were standing in tripledigit temperatures just to order, do a little dance waiting for that special doughnut. Moving from breakfast to your snack, how about a wine and cheezit combo in one big old box there . The brainchild of a wine maker, house wine, and of course che
A really interesting way when the democratic chairman Jerrold Nadler said 3 times repeating you did not exonerate trump and muller said yes to all 3 of those answers so in many ways hes challenging trying to narrative of what has actually happened and i think that thats something that the democrats will definitely use to continue to emphasize both from mischaracterize what the report said and also that the report does have a lot of really. Challenging evidence to show that there are many points where trump obstructed justice we now see the democrats are continuing to try to emphasize that to state it in plain language because very few people have actually read the report to try to pick out the most egregious examples of potential of struction to get muller to acknowledge them to to restate them in plain terms for a larger public as to whether that information well really galvanize people to continue some of these investigations or push to impeachment as Many Democrats want thats anothe