Sometimes the inspectors were out there several times in one year, nso what can be done to make sure that this wont happen in the future . Im making sure that we get every permit required for all dispensaries. In the past, i wasnt part of the program, but from my understanding and the path a referral went to the department until land use was approved, then, the referral came back and it was marked approved or disapproved, but there wasnt specific conditions stated explicitly on that referral. Whereas with our referral now, when when we sent those referrals over, there was an explanation as to why they denied them and what they would have to do. Okay. But that thats all i can say. What i also want to say that i personally spoke to Larry Kessler, and Larry Kessler does not remember any phone call with anyone from bloom room authorizing him. At the directors hearing no, and i appreciate that. I dont think that is as concerning to me as the fact and i agree with you as far as and then, the
Is the best way for the port to consider. And they should show us the nuance and gray areas but we will look at that. But i dont think were going to have a big philosophical discussion of maritime versus other but it will be nuances. I would hope that. But when i look at the criteria i dont see anything that ponies to maritime. Points to maritime. So all evaluation criteria will get points. The reality is they may impute it. But it is not a requirement from the pointing perspective. On page 12 of the staff report, we outline the scoring criteria with more detail than we saw on the slides. And if you look at 1b and 1e under quality of Design Development submittal, 1b talks about Performance Trust objectives which includes maritime and 1e calls out this balance that commissioner makras is pointing out. I agree it doesnt talk about how they are weighted but maritime is called out. So how many people are going to be on the panel. At least four. And its in the waterfront plan or include jus
Maritime. Points to maritimel evaluation criteria will get poe reality is they may impute it. T a requirement from the pointing. On page 12 of the staff repoe the scoring criteria with more e saw on the slides. And if you ld 1e under quality of design devet submittal, 1b talks about perfot objectives which includes marite calls out this balance that comr makras is pointing out. I agreet talk about how they are weightee is called out. So how many people are goinge panel. At least four. And its in tt plan or include just a momen. I saw that. But is four a go . Dont you usually need an odd n . Well, theres scoring so i me was a tie i guess having a fifte good. And we left it open. But , it has development expert, porty member and person representing r regional interest. We thought in additional need, we could add ar expertise if needed. When is that decision going . Who is going to be included on . We would in our schedule g to begin to put names out there, have the rfps out on the street
Department and valley lopez, deputy City Attorney representing the department of Public Health. The meeting guidelines are as follows. Turn off or silence phone and other Electronic Devices so they will not disturb the proceedings. Carry on conversations in the hallway. The rules of presentation are as follows. Appellants, permit holders and department responders are each given 7 minutes to present the case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated with the parties must include the comments within the seven or three minute periods. Members of the public who are not affiliated have three minutes and no rebuttal. Please speak into the microphone. For continued cases, they get 3 minutes each with no rebuttal. To i assist in the board accurate presentation, you are asked but not required to submit a speaker card. Speaker cards are available on the left side of the podium. Four votes are required to grant an appeal. Please note that the board reserves the right not to call an item after
Out there several times in one year, nso what can be done to make sure that this wont happen in the future . Im making sure that we get every permit required for all dispensaries. In the past, i wasnt part of the program, but from my understanding and the path a referral went to the department until land use was approved, then, the referral came back and it was marked approved or disapproved, but there wasnt specific conditions stated explicitly on that referral. Whereas with our referral now, when when we sent those referrals over, there was an explanation as to why they denied them and what they would have to do. Okay. But that thats all i can say. What i also want to say that i personally spoke to Larry Kessler, and Larry Kessler does not remember any phone call with anyone from bloom room authorizing him. At the directors hearing no, and i appreciate that. I dont think that is as concerning to me as the fact and i agree with you as far as and then, the last question, going back to